Search for: "Brown v. Martinez" Results 61 - 80 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 5:20 pm by Lowell Brown
Perez, Victoria, District 11 Carlo Taboada, Brownsville, District 12 Cade Browning, Abilene, District 14 Stephen J. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:16 am by Susan Brenner
  This test derives from the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v.Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936), which is discussed in the article. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:24 am by Cormac Early
 As Lyle Denniston explains for this blog, the stay will allow the Court to consider how last Term’s decision in Martinez v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:14 am
`Little albino bear, this is brown bear, going to go tax this sticks guy, be nice to have u watchin my back/w/pistol, put this shit behind us! [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These principles apply to allegations of legal malpractice (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d 1589, 1594 [2017]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]; Snyder v Brown Chiari, LLP, 116 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2014]; Alaimo v McGeorge, 69 AD3d 1032, 1034 [2010]). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am by John Elwood
  First up is Brown v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
 at ___ (Martinez, J., dissenting).In this Court, the Borrowers assert the same substantive arguments that they did in the court of appeals. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
Arizona, 10-9742, for Martinez v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by Lyle Denniston
   The cases are Kellogg Brown & Root Services v.Harris and KBR Inc., v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
Martinez ("The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Enrique Martinez, the defendant, a continuance to secure the services of counsel of his choice in violation of his rights under the sixth amendment to the federal constitution. [read post]