Search for: "Brown v. People" Results 41 - 60 of 3,708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
Nicholas Leicester [2024] ECC Lei 2 This judgment (which was preceded by three interim judgments with the neutral citations [2023] ECC Lei 1, [2023] ECC Lei 2 and [2023] ECC Lei 3, dealing with preliminary issues) relates to a petition for the introduction of a new altar frontal displaying the colours of the Progress Pride flag, the church having come to be regarded over time as a safe worshipping space for LGBTQIA+ people of faith. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Scholars have recently criticized Fourth Amendment pretext doctrine for leading to more police contact with Black and brown people and thus to racially disproportionate uses of excessive force. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:59 am by Thorin Klosowski
The NSA has a long history of spying on Americans, but we hadn't gotten to Jewel v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Will Baude
Rebecca Brown, at the University of Southern California, has been teaching constitutional law for 35 years. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Purcell recounts, the Taft Court understood itself as an unmediated channel for the values and mores of the American people. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, people may assume that the American system never allowed such a broad conception of impeachment. [read post]