Search for: "Brown v. Richardson" Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm by Colin Murray
That seems to me to be a travesty of the true position which simply ignores the Browne Report and the extensive debate which took place inside and outside Parliament, both during the period when that investigation was being undertaken and subsequently when modifications to the Browne proposals were under consideration. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:05 pm
Brown, 4298, 5462/02, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 7793; 55 A.D.3d 393; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:56 am by Jim Hassett
While we are not aware of any AmLaw 100 firms that have gone so far as to appoint the Value Council mentioned in Step 2, we did write an article for Bloomberg Law Reports recently entitled “The Rise of the Pricing Director,” including interviews with senior lawyers and staff at Baker & McKenzie, Fish & Richardson, Mayer Brown, Vinson & Elkins, Reed Smith and Winston & Strawn which described what law firms are doing to address a number of the issues… [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
But some of that work was as a consultant to Thurgood Marshall in preparing the Supreme Court case Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:33 am by Lowell Brown
In other action, the board: Heard a report from outside counsel on the McDonald v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Evan Brown’s Blog has considered how we attribute value to non fungible tokens (“NFTs”) by demarcating how we ascribe value to things that physically exist and those that exist intangibly. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
Defining WIPO’s role (Intellectual Property Watch) Introduction to patent monetisation resources for corporations and entrepreneurs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Top PCT filing firms revealed (IAM) Commercialising innovation mini-series – interview with industrial designer Jim Richardson (IP Watchdog) Royalty triggers are fraught with litigation risk, so handle with care (Technology Transfer Tactics) The IP zone: a new concept for introducing needed information and… [read post]