Search for: "Brown v. Super. Ct."
Results 1 - 20
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2024, 4:10 am
In Buck v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
See, e.g., Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
See, e.g., Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ct., filed 9/8/2023), alleges violations of California's open meeting law ("Brown Act") that prevented adequate participation in school board meetings by members of the Jewish community. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
The writing is super approachable, so it’s a pretty good piece for students. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
See, e.g., Brown v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:58 am
Ct. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:09 am
Super. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
See Edwards v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
Super. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Ct. 2407, 2423-24 , (2022) (cleaned up). [9] 29 C.F.R. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:15 am
Ct. [read post]
2 May 2022, 3:00 am
See also Brown v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases (for instance,… [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Some people are getting this priceless protection, and others are not, with little justification for the different treatment but just because they drew a judge who is more open to pseudonymity or because the judge found their plight to be specially sympathetic. [1] See Hundtofte v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 11:52 am
That's super good impeachment stuff. [read post]
