Search for: "Brown v. Texas" Results 141 - 160 of 1,152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2007, 11:47 pm
" Nevertheless, critics of the Texas law say it's an aberration -- a slippery legal statute that stands in direct violation of the 1982 Supreme Court decision in Enmund v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
To keep your sex business free from the coils of federal regulation, your best bet might in fact be Ted Cruz, implacable opponent of Operation Choke Point [Elizabeth Nolan Brown; more from Snopes on rather silly attacks on Cruz for doing job lawyers are expected to do for clients in Texas case] Snoopy, you’re not systematically important: judge frees MetLife from SIFI designation under Dodd-Frank [Thaya Brook Knight/Cato, John Cochrane] What with Sen. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Rose Falconer
  Since the US Supreme Court gave its decision in US v Windsor on 26 June 2013, five states (Utah, Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia, and Michigan) have struck down bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
Texas, the challenge to the Obama administration’s deferred-action policy for undocumented immigrants. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
She wants the money that criminal defendants pay in court costs to directly benefit the court system.The First Court panel deciding Peraza v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 6:43 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court decisions, including Kingsley Books, Inc. v Brown and Pittsburgh Press Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
Invariably, criticisms of the "writ of erasure" turn to the massive resistance to Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:24 am by Heidi Henson
Here, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Texas Supreme Court’s ruling in Montgomery County Hosp Dist v Brown makes clear that while an oral agreement can modify an employee’s at-will employment status, to do so, the employer must unequivocally indicate its “definite intent to be bound not to terminate the employee except under clearly specified circumstances.” [read post]