Search for: "Brown v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In the 2012 decision United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Ms Martin-Pratt is currently the Deputy Director General of Directorate Trade and previously served as the Head of Copyright Unit of the Commission’s Communications, Networks, Content and Technology DG, among other, earlier illustrious posts. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
Former Obama administration acting Solicitor General Neil Katyal actually declared that the indictment “is up there with Dred Scott, it is up there with Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 7:13 pm
Madison, Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
This is not unproblematic: the European Union undertakes here the same unilateralism that it used to criticize when previously done by the United States, with the Helms/Burton Act as the most prominent example. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
An example is Ramos v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:39 am
Elite colleges and universities in the United States have been historically reserved for wealthy, predominantly white Americans. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm
See, e.g., “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018), and the sequel, “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
(That "standard" was set by the Supreme Court in Caeteno v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
The Constitution’s Appointments Clause makes clear that the President nominates “officers of the United States,” but this nomination is subject to the Advice and Consent of the Senate. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:40 pm
Case Name: Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:11 pm
” (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
They want access to our markets without being held responsible for the damage they are causing to consumers here in the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
Then again, if the government could ignore unpopular Supreme Court rulings, what would have come of Brown v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
