Search for: "Brown v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 3,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am by Anushka Limaye
Craig Forcese discussed Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou’s legal battle in Canada over extradition to the United States, and Quinta Jurecic shared Huawei’s lawsuit against the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:10 am by Joy Waltemath
Reviewing the parties’ summary judgment decision, the appeals court concluded that the factors described in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
" You learn something new every day.Robert Brauneis and Anke Moerland's recent article argues that it would not be good policy to allow the company that distributes siggi's ® yogurt to trademark the name SKYR for yogurt in the United States, even though most people in the United States do not currently know what the word "skyr" means. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
" You learn something new every day.Robert Brauneis and Anke Moerland's recent article argues that it would not be good policy to allow the company that distributes siggi's ® yogurt to trademark the name SKYR for yogurt in the United States, even though most people in the United States do not currently know what the word "skyr" means. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 5:00 pm by Ed Driscoll
He first ran for president in 1976 as the candidate of the left-wing United States Labor Party, now defunct. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) stated that the rescission would “rob families of their hard-earned money. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, cases such as Brown v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Cybersecurity of the Person, First Amendment Law Review, 2019, Jeff Kosseff, United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm by Berry Law Firm
Wilkie case was heard at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by a full panel of judges (en banc) and that means it has precedential effect (it can be used as law and binding on future issues). [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm by Berry Law Firm
Wilkie case was heard at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by a full panel of judges (en banc) and that means it has precedential effect (it can be used as law and binding on future issues). [read post]