Search for: "Brown v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 4,530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I instead came away with the impression that the historian George Brown Tindall was correct to conclude that during the 1920s southern apartheid “was settled. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
But bad as we may sincerely, even correctly, believe some of these decisions to be, they are still the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
& Pol'y Rev. 53, 66 & n.49, 98 & n.207 (1999); see also Timothy Farrar, Manual of the Constitution of the United States of America 436 (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 3d ed. rev. 1872) ("The general power of impeachment and trial may extend to others besides civil officers, as military or naval officers, or even persons not in office, and to other offences than those expressly requiring a judgment of removal from office . . . . [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In the standoff between Texas and the United States gov't over Gov. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Des Moines | United States Courts Criminal Cases | United States Courts [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
The book greatly influenced Thurgood Marshall, who “referred to the work as ‘the bible’ of Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am by Josh Blackman
Johnson was one of many Democrats who continued to maintain after the passage of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments that the United States was committed to a white man's government. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
 The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
  A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
“Maybe put most boldly, I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States. [read post]
  On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]