Search for: "Brown v. Wilkinson" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 5:36 pm by Mark Graber
The theory of judicial review today must be different than 75 years ago, because any contemporary theory must justify Brown v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by CMS
One of its UK-registered subsidiaries, Kellogg Brown & Root ltd (“KBR UK”), was under investigation by the SFO in connection with their projects involving another company, Unaoil. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 3:29 pm
  Another footnote says that the Fourth's logic under Wilkinson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm by David Bernstein
As for Hand, true to his Progressive (as in the early 20th century Progressive movement) ideology, his valedictory lectures at Harvard Law School in the late 1950s denounced Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
Copyright is like theft and, on the authority of a dictum of Lord Browne-Wilkinson's in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] AC 669, stolen property is subject to a constructive trust in favour of the rightful owner. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court again considered Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s judgment in the case of Target Holdings (above). [read post]
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in the Bland case [1993] AC 789 , 877, the questions for us are questions of law, “[but] behind the questions of law lie moral, ethical, medical and practical issues of fundamental importance to society”. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
Regular readers will recall that blanket policies are not to be encouraged (those with a need for more citable authority should see something like Lord Browne-Wilkinson in R v SSHD ex p Venables). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
Regular readers will recall that blanket policies are not to be encouraged (those with a need for more citable authority should see something like Lord Browne-Wilkinson in R v SSHD ex p Venables). [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Pepper v Hart said that Article IX was ‘a provision of the highest constitutional importance’ which ‘should not be narrowly construed’. [read post]