Search for: "Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. NLRB"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2015, 11:56 am
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Patrick Bannon The National Labor Relations Board’s decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., announced last week, dramatically expands joint employer liability under the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm
The National Labor Relations Board has made good on its recent promise to move forward with rulemaking to re-establish the decades-old joint employer standard in place prior to the Board’s 2015 decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015) (Browning-Ferris or BFI), petition for review docketed Browning-Ferris Indus. of Cal.… [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:12 pm
In that case, Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:12 pm
In that case, Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:00 am
This Friday’s Five covers five employment law developments that occurred in August 2015 that will have an impact for employers in California. 1) NLRB ruling widens which companies may be considered “joint employers” In a 3-2 decision, the NLRB ruled that Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. was a joint employer with a staffing agency, Leadpoint Business Services, and therefore… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 2:57 pm
After the comment period, the NLRB issued the final rule in 2020, reversing the NLRB’s groundbreaking decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, 362 NLRB 1599 (2015) (BFI), which held an employer could be considered a joint employer as long as it exercised “indirect control” over working conditions or had “reserved authority” to do so. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:31 pm
California’s Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) also sets forth law regarding California’s wage and hour requirements. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 11:51 am
The Court of Appeals accepted the case and recently issued a decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:42 am
Ever since the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued its August 2015 decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., holding two entities may be joint employers if one exercises either direct or indirect control over the terms and conditions of the other’s employees or reserves the right to do so, the concept of joint employment has generated increased interest from plaintiffs’ attorneys, and increased… [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:38 am
Circuit’s focus on common-law principles in its recent decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Employers are anticipating that the new Board and General Counsel will reform the following Obama-era precedents: Browning-Ferris Indus. of California, et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:02 pm
Employers are anticipating that the new Board and General Counsel will reform the following Obama-era precedents: Browning-Ferris Indus. of California, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:30 am
In the case of Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. (2015) NLRB No. 672 (“BFI”), BFI retained the services of Leadpoint Business Services (“LBS”) to provide staff to one of BFI’s recycling facilities. [read post]
The National Labor Relations Board says “Happy Labor Day” with Flurry of Late Summer Pro-Union Moves
9 Sep 2015, 12:59 pm
And Don’t Forget… The Board’s recent decision greatly expanding the scope of the reach of its joint employer test in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., 362 NLRB No. 186 (August 27, 2015). [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
In Browning-Ferris Industries of California Inc.,[1] the Obama board in 2015 upended the existing case law by finding that a company contracting for services could be deemed a joint employer of the service provider’s employees if the company indirectly exercised control over the employment terms/conditions through the contractor or merely reserved that right to control — even though it might not have been exercised. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 12:14 pm
La decisión: El 27 de agosto de 2015, en Browning-Ferris Industries of California Inc., et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Circuit recently reminded the agency in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
