Search for: "Bruce Ackerman"
Results 1 - 20
of 517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
And from the reviews: “Bruce Ackerman is one of the brilliant political philosophers of our time. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (2010). 72. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
The most remarkable thing about last Thursday’s oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Bruce Ackerman had written that the conservatives faced “a huge test,” with their integrity on the line if they didn’t follow liberal views of what “fidelity” to the Constitution requires. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election BallotPart Two: The Three Possible, but Less-than-Ideal, Dispositions of the CasePart Three: Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t AddressBruce Ackerman Misunderstands My Point About What Colorado is Doing and May Do [UPDATED to respond to Bruce's follow-up post]Part Four:… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
That question in turn raises sub-questions, as discussed thoughtfully along with discussion of many of the other issues by Professor Marty Lederman in a multi-part series on Balkinization, which also includes helpful recent contributions from Professors Bruce Ackerman, Mark Graber, and Gerard Magliocca.(9) Intertwined with some of the foregoing questions, does the case present a nonjusticiable political question? [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
Were there a chance of a "shakedown" period in which that misunderstanding could be overcome, perhaps the consequences Bruce and others fear might be tempered, but I seriously doubt that there would be such a shakedown period or that the tempering efect would be large. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm
I'm not sure what I wrote to give Bruce that impression, but it's the furthest thing from the truth. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
Anderson: Marty Lederman’s Fundamental Mistake of Law Bruce Ackerman I have learned a lot from Marty Lederman over the years, so I was surprised to find that Part 1 of his “User’s Guide to Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:05 am
Bruce Ackerman, We The People (Harv. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
[Oral Argument in Moore v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
United States – raises two vital matters: 1) Can Congress tax unrealized capital gains, as Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman argues in an amicus brief; and 2) Can Congress enact a Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren-style wealth tax, including on unrealized capital gains, as the two Amar brothers (Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar) argue? [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in an important tax case, Moore v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 5:16 pm
Anybody interested in reading the full text of our "originalist" brief should go to https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx and then search for the name "Bruce Ackerman". [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
From Balkinization: Bruce Ackerman (Yale Law School) on "The Original Understanding of the Sixteenth Amendment. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Loughlin recognizes the centrality of Reconstruction to American constitutionalism (see his discussion of Bruce Ackerman’s work (p. 146–47)). [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:47 pm
” Prior winners include Karl Llewellyn, John Rawls, Ronald Dworkin, Louis Henkin, Bruce Ackerman, Frank Michelman, Cass Sunstein, Martha Nussbaum, Jeremy Waldron, Laurence Tribe, and Owen Fiss. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:49 am
Over a year ago, Bruce Ackerman and I co-authored this essay in Politico about the potential for a constitutional crisis in 2024. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Likewise, Bruce Ackerman and Gerard Magliocca have argued that Trump can be barred from the presidency if Congress declares that, by encouraging the attack on the Capitol, Trump engaged in “insurrection or rebellion. [read post]
