Search for: "Bruce Ackerman"
Results 201 - 220
of 517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2007, 2:12 pm
The article quotes Bruce Ackerman's LRB column on the matter (available here) as follows:"The promise of democratic legitimacy is a sham," wrote Bruce Ackerman, a professor of law and political science at Yale, in The London Review of Books. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:00 am
[More…] SEC Probes Departure of PepsiCo’s Former Top Lawyer by Andrew Ackerman, Joe Palazzolo and Jennifer Maloney in the Wall Street Journal Federal securities regulators are investigating an allegation by PepsiCo Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Now, laments Yale Law School’s Bruce Ackerman, legislators see lame-duck sessions as a time to consider serious measures free of political accountability. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
Bruce Ackerman has feared a “decline and fall of the American Republic,” given that escalating power struggles between the branches of government could leave “the military as a potential arbiter” (85). [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:57 pm
In his decision, Judge Bruce E. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
Since the book's release we've noted several reviews of Bruce Ackerman's We the People: Vol. 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:58 am
In the course of doing so I also say a few things about my ongoing exchange with Bruce Ackerman over legal interpretation in the executive branch. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:09 am
Responding to the administration's torture policies and other human rights violations, Jack Balkin and Bruce Ackerman have suggested two approaches. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm
The six scholars are Bruce Ackerman, Vikram Amar, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, and Adam Winkler.Former guest blogger Emily Kadens has taken up residence at the John W. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:59 am
See, for example, Bruce Ackerman's Op Ed from last year. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:43 am
Featuring some of America's finest legal minds--Cass Sunstein, Bruce Ackerman, Robert Post, Harold Koh, Larry Kramer, Noah Feldman, Pam Karlan, William Eskridge, Mark Tushnet, Yochai Benkler and Richard Ford, among others--the book tackles a wide range of issues, including the challenge of new technologies, presidential power, international human rights, religious liberty, freedom of speech, voting, reproductive rights, and economic rights. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:03 pm
Ian Ayres and Bruce Ackerman have an op-ed and blog post with a different, quite interesting proposal: Making federal contracts contingent on contracting corporations agreeing not to engage in electioneering speech--sort of a contractor analogue to the Hatch Act prohibitions on government employees. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:40 am
Alas, I learned from WikiPedia that though she's but a few years younger than nominee Bruce Ackerman, she seems not to have earned her J.D. till well after him. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
In particular, it is hard to account for the extraordinary increase in presidential power that Arthur Schlesinger has described as the “imperial presidency,” and which is critiqued in Bruce Ackerman’s most recent work, simply in terms of formal amendments and judicial precedents. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am
It’s a path of course well explored by Bruce Ackerman along with other scholars including yours truly.By contrast, originalists tend to take the problem of informal constitutional change so seriously that they wind up condemning all significant developments outside Article V as illegitimate. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:59 pm
(Natalie Oman, Opinio Juris, March 17, 2011)("responsibility to protect") It's Not Up to the President to Impose a No-Fly Zone Over Libya(Bruce Ackerman & Oona A. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:29 pm
I doubt that even Bruce Ackerman intended it to be used as a prescriptive tool, justifying the intentional strong-arming of existing rules and procedures so as to achieve a desired result. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:36 am
Writing in the LA Times, Bruce Ackerman likewise expressed doubts that the Justice Department’s OLC backed the decision: Normally, presidents rely on the Justice Department to present their case on matters of high constitutional importance. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:59 pm
(Tribe's article was a response to an article by Bruce Ackerman and David Golove, and the particular issue that separated them was whether NAFTA was invalid because not a treaty. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Lazarus's piece was emailed around the YLS faculty yesterday by Professor Bruce Ackerman—who is, along with Akhil Amar, one of Yale Law's leading scholars of constitutional law, as well as no one's idea of a conservative. [read post]
