Search for: "Bruce Ackerman" Results 241 - 260 of 517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2012, 10:21 am by Rekha Arulanantham
  Usually, leaks are a very good thing for democracy and free speech, as Professor Bruce Ackerman writes in an excellent op-ed this morning. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:32 am by Rob Robinson (Jason Krause) Inadvertent Disclosure By Expert Waives Privilege – (Doug Austin) Insights from the ABA National Institute on eDiscovery - Part 2 – (Wystan Ackerman) Is Your Privilege Mired in Your TAR? [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:02 am by David Kopel
” Begins with Edward Abbey and Bruce Ackerman, and concludes with Aaron Zelman. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:12 am by Robert Chesney
 So argues Bruce Ackerman in this op-ed, which ran in the Washington Post this weekend. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:51 am by Raffaela Wakeman
In opposition to CIA Director David Petraeus’ proposal to expand drone attacks in Yemen, Bruce Ackerman penned this op-ed in the Washington Post. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by JB
The Internet and digital media, which blend traditional legal experts, journalists, commentators, and the general public, have, if anything, enhanced these features of American constitutional culture.The all-star cast of participants includes: Bruce Ackerman (Yale), Akhil Amar (Yale), Jack Balkin (Yale), Emily Bazelon (Yale, Slate), Joan Biskupic (Reuters News), Sujit Choudhry (NYU), Justin Driver (Texas, New Republic), Garrett Epps (University of Baltimore, American Prospect),… [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Lawrence Solum
A long line of leading constitutional scholars, such as Bruce Ackerman, Alexander Bickel, Charles Black, Walter Dellinger, Gerald Gunther, and Michael Paulsen, have argued that the Constitution does not authorize limited conventions. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:04 am by Jack Goldsmith
Kevin Jon Heller at Opinio Juris responds to Peter Berkowitz’s critique of Bruce Ackerman’s argument that a self-defensive attack on Iran would be unlawful. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:32 am by Lovechilde
Yale Professor Bruce Ackerman and Anne Alstott have proposed a 2 percent surtax on the wealth of the richest one-half of 1 percent of Americans owning more than $7.2 million of assets. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:19 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  He now has offered another defense of such an attack in response to an editorial by Bruce Ackerman in the L.A Times. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
 In the legal academic literature, the leading example of this critique was a 1985 Harvard Law Review article by Bruce Ackerman called Beyond Carolene Products, in which Ackerman explains why discrete and insular minorities may, by virtue of those characteristics, be better positioned to advance their interests through the political process than are inchoate, diffuse majorities. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 8:17 pm by Rick Hasen
Drawing battle lines early, in the event of a Romney victory and a Scalia or Kennedy retirement. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 4:16 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  Bruce Ackerman subsequently argued that such a strike “would be a violation of both international law and the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:19 pm by Julian Ku
by Julian Ku David French and Jay Sekulow respond to Bruce Ackerman’s legal argument about the use of force against Iran with a factual claim: Iran has already attacked the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:18 am by Julian Ku
Bruce Ackerman of Yale has quite a different take of US views on preemptive self-defense over at the LA Times. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
: Reconciling Crisis and Constraint at the Office of Legal Counsel,  which argues that Bruce Ackerman’s proposal to transform OLC into a “Supreme Executive Tribunal” – reviewed by Trevor here – would yield the worst of both worlds – the rigidity of courts, plus the strategic behavior of executive agencies.) [read post]