Search for: "Bruce Ackerman"
Results 281 - 300
of 520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
Daniels Trebilcock’s Heresy Owen Fiss Regulation And Public Law In Comparative Perspective Susan Rose-Ackerman Legal Universalism: Persistent Objections Kevin E. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:05 am
The Internet and digital media, which blend traditional legal experts, journalists, commentators, and the general public, have, if anything, enhanced these features of American constitutional culture.The all-star cast of participants includes: Bruce Ackerman (Yale), Akhil Amar (Yale), Jack Balkin (Yale), Emily Bazelon (Yale, Slate), Joan Biskupic (Reuters News), Sujit Choudhry (NYU), Justin Driver (Texas, New Republic), Garrett Epps (University of Baltimore, American Prospect),… [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:54 pm
Big-name liberal constitutional law scholars range from originalists like Akhil Amar, to Bruce Ackerman’s “constitutional moment” approach, to “living Constitution” theories of various types (e.g. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:07 am
(Bruce Ackerman outlined the problem about a decade ago.)But, whatever we end up thinking about the constitutionality of a consumption tax, Chafetz's throwaway line certainly doesn't advance the ball. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:13 pm
But as Bruce Ackerman captured in his pioneering Harvard Law Review piece, The New Separation of Powers, this is not always the case. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
Links to the collected posts, from a range of scholars — including Bruce Ackerman, Marty Lederman, Gillian Metzger, and Zach Price, among others — can be found here. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm
This story corrects the narrative put forward by Bruce Ackerman and others that in 1936 the American people faced a choice between the constitutional positions of the President and the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:35 am
Here they are: Floyd Abrams Spencer Ackerman David Addington Mike Allen Michael Anton Kurt Armfeld (?) [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:19 pm
In Politico, Bruce Ackerman and Gerard Magliocca wrote: Section 3 of the 14th Amendment — the Disqualification Clause — expressly bars any person from holding "any office, civil or military, under the United States" if he "engaged in insurrection" against the Constitution after previously swearing to uphold it "as an officer of the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:37 am
Bruce Ackerman) about whether the United States could treat such agreements as "congressional-executive agreements" (as opposed to "treaties" which, under Art. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:29 pm
Americans should be aware that, as Bruce Ackerman puts it, "[t]his isn't the way we do things in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:37 pm
Ok Governor, I think I grok you:Don't be angry - don't be sadDon't sit crying over good times you've hadThere's a girl right next to youAnd she's just waiting for something to doSpeaking of lovin' the one you're with, Michael Hanzman has gone and done it again -- effective July 1, he will be of counsel to his buddy Scott Link at Ackerman, Link & Sartory, P.A.And his former partner and permanent citrus crusader Bobby Gilbert is now teamed up… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:28 pm
If we cannot have more robust institutional reform of the kind Bruce Ackerman suggests—a Senate confirmable executive tribunal whose members serve as independent judges for the executive branch—we can at least have a fully functioning independent institution as Johnsen argues. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:26 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars – Bruce Ackerman, Vikram Amar, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, and Adam Winkler – demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:07 am
UPDATE: Here is some additional commentary from Bruce Ackerman, Lawrence Tribe, and Adam White. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
This story corrects the narrative put forward by Bruce Ackerman and others that in 1936 the American people faced a choice between the constitutional positions of the President and the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 3:46 pm
I argue that a theory of constitutional change that focuses on how the Constitution is implemented through institutions over time amid the tensions between the "written" and the "unwritten," the "legal" and the "political," offers a better approach to understanding the Bush presidency than the major alternative theories offered by Karl Llewellyn, Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson, and Keith Whittington. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 6:46 am
Bruce Ackerman has written on this alarming view of military control apparently endorsed by the news pages of the New York Times. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:21 am
At the Huffington Post, Bruce Ackerman asks whether the Court is “about to declare war on the twentieth century,” considering this question in light of the Court’s decision last June in the Affordable Care Act case, this Term’s Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 7:28 am
I argue that a theory of constitutional change that focuses on how the Constitution is implemented through institutions over time amid the tensions between the "written" and the "unwritten," the "legal" and the "political," offers a better approach to understanding the Bush presidency than the major alternative theories offered by Karl Llewellyn, Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson, and Keith Whittington. [read post]
