Search for: "Bruce Ackerman" Results 321 - 340 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2010, 3:49 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Professor Ackerman's theory is more complex than this short description - it requires the book length treatment he has given it. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm by Thomas Crocker
Times, Bruce Ackerman proposes creating a presidential commission on civil-military relations tasked with formulating a new canon of military ethics to clarify principles of constitutional governance in the modern world, and writes about these issues in his forthcoming book. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:56 pm
Or perhaps Ackerman and Kiel are positing that Gonzales is just bad at covering up for the Administration. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 11:12 pm
Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman's views about constitutional change map perfectly onto the lawbreaking of Washington and Lincoln. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:17 pm
The absolute neutrality toward all conceptions of the good proposed by Ronald Dworkin and Bruce Ackerman are only one available flavor of neutrality.The range of possible justifications for any version of neutrality is broad. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:29 am
Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman and Congressman David Wu describe another: The real debate on Iraq begins with Congress's consideration of the military budget. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 7:08 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Bruce Ackerman excoriated a brief by the government that sought to dismiss a lawsuit by his client, Captain Nathan Smith, claiming that the United States’ ongoing war against the Islamic State is unconstitutional in the absence of a new AUMF. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 As Bruce Ackerman explained in volume I of We the People: After the New Deal revolution, “[a] commitment to federalism . . . was no longer thought to require a constitutional strategy that restrained the national government to a limited number of enumerated powers over economic and social life. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 10:01 pm
The Living Constitution by Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:54 pm
As prominent liberal constitutional law scholar Bruce Ackerman points out, Obama’s violations of the Constitution in this respect go far beyond anything done by George W. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:49 am
(See, for example, Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman's criticism. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 2:59 pm
"--Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale University [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 9:23 am
  Bruce Ackerman has a very nice discussion of the House of Lords and what to do about it here. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:26 am
John Yoo is, of course, full of it, as Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman explained: BA: The president has to get another authorization for a war against Iran. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:13 pm
The Holmes Lectures that Bruce Ackerman gave at Harvard--which form part of the foundation of Volume 3 of We the People--focus on statutes which might achieve a constitution-like status. [read post]
31 May 2009, 1:04 pm
At least in California, the situation has become sufficiently catastrophic that serious people are talking about a constitutional convention and serious change.What will it take for even one "respectable" person--I take it that Larry Sabato and I are viewed simply as academic flakes--to suggest that we might at least initiate such a conversation before catastrophe occurs instead of waiting, in Bruce Ackerman's term, for "the next attack," whether that… [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:20 am by Ritika Singh
Bruce Riedel and I briefly discuss the state of the talks here. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 8:49 am
The fact that Richard Epstein, or Akhil Amar, or Bruce Ackerman, swung by last year tells me nothing substantial about your law school. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:03 am by Alfred Brophy
 And mind you I'm not talking only about some Bruce Ackerman constitutional moment argument here. [read post]