Search for: "Bruce Ackerman" Results 321 - 340 of 517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2007, 7:56 pm
Or perhaps Ackerman and Kiel are positing that Gonzales is just bad at covering up for the Administration. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm by Thomas Crocker
Times, Bruce Ackerman proposes creating a presidential commission on civil-military relations tasked with formulating a new canon of military ethics to clarify principles of constitutional governance in the modern world, and writes about these issues in his forthcoming book. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:49 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Professor Ackerman's theory is more complex than this short description - it requires the book length treatment he has given it. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 11:12 pm
Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman's views about constitutional change map perfectly onto the lawbreaking of Washington and Lincoln. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:17 pm
The absolute neutrality toward all conceptions of the good proposed by Ronald Dworkin and Bruce Ackerman are only one available flavor of neutrality.The range of possible justifications for any version of neutrality is broad. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 7:08 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Bruce Ackerman excoriated a brief by the government that sought to dismiss a lawsuit by his client, Captain Nathan Smith, claiming that the United States’ ongoing war against the Islamic State is unconstitutional in the absence of a new AUMF. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:51 pm
In the past year, Slate has run stories by Bruce Ackerman, Ahkil Amar, Frank Bowman, Bill Eskridge, David Fontana, Richard Thompson Ford, Bennett Gershman, Jack Goldsmith, Rick Hasen Orin Kerr, Neal Katyal, Marty Lederman, Eric Posner, Jamin Raskin, Jim Ryan and Kenji Yoshino (and I'm sure I missed a few too). [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:20 am by Ritika Singh
Bruce Riedel and I briefly discuss the state of the talks here. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:03 am by Alfred Brophy
 And mind you I'm not talking only about some Bruce Ackerman constitutional moment argument here. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 As Bruce Ackerman explained in volume I of We the People: After the New Deal revolution, “[a] commitment to federalism . . . was no longer thought to require a constitutional strategy that restrained the national government to a limited number of enumerated powers over economic and social life. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:13 pm
The Holmes Lectures that Bruce Ackerman gave at Harvard--which form part of the foundation of Volume 3 of We the People--focus on statutes which might achieve a constitution-like status. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:26 am
John Yoo is, of course, full of it, as Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman explained: BA: The president has to get another authorization for a war against Iran. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
In The Atlantic, Bruce Ackerman and Ian Ayres contend that the Court’s recent decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 8:49 am
The fact that Richard Epstein, or Akhil Amar, or Bruce Ackerman, swung by last year tells me nothing substantial about your law school. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:50 am by Peter Spiro
Given the unfavorable response to the statutory argument (for the latest entries, see Bruce Ackerman, Richard Epstein, and Jonathan Schell), perhaps the constitutional defense would have been the better. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 10:01 pm
The Living Constitution by Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:49 am
(See, for example, Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman's criticism. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:32 am by Lovechilde
Yale Professor Bruce Ackerman and Anne Alstott have proposed a 2 percent surtax on the wealth of the richest one-half of 1 percent of Americans owning more than $7.2 million of assets. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:59 pm
Drawing on Bruce Ackerman's language, the Essay argues that every presidential transition is, in an important sense, a constitutional moment. [read post]