Search for: "Bruce Ackerman" Results 41 - 60 of 501
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2019, 7:35 am by Steve Gottlieb
Some of you may think that my comments on the subpoenas and Bruce Ackerman’s comments on the rules for the trial of the impeachment charges are in conflict. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 5:20 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School has written a clear description of the rules that will apply in the Senate. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 It is worth noting that Bruce Ackerman's important rendering of the the New Deal as a "constitutional moment" amending the Constitution outside Article V in effect requires ignoring, or at least diminishing the relevance, of McCulloch. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Bruce Ackerman pointed out years ago, the New Deal Court embraced John Marshall and McCulloch in order to add a patina of original understanding to its startling restructuring of federal power. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 6:06 am by Stephen Sachs
His discussion of "the deliberate will of the people" reminds me of Bruce Ackerman on dualist democracy, or maybe it should be the other way around. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:08 pm by Howard Bashman
“John Roberts Won’t Let Mitch McConnell Derail a Trump Impeachment Trial”: Law professor Bruce Ackerman has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 11:32 am by Pam Rentz
Please join the Lillian Goldman Law Library for a book talk with Professor Bruce Ackerman ’67. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm by Guest Blogger
For the symposium on Lawrence Lessig, Fidelity and Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2019).I am grateful to Jack Balkin and the Balkinization blog for the careful and powerful collection of review essays based on my book Fidelity & Constraint (2019). [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:48 am by Steve Lubet
David Abraham, Professor of Law Emeritus, University of Miami School of Law Jeffrey Abramson, Professor of Law & Government, University of Texas at Austin School of Law Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale Law School Neal Allen, Chair and Associate Professor of Political Science, Wichita State University William Araiza, Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School Sahar Aziz, Professor of Law, Rutgers Law School Asli Bâli, Professor of… [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am by John Mikhail
  Like Bruce Ackerman, he seeks to justify the New Deal era decisions that transformed American constitutional law and created a new baseline that has been (mostly) stable ever since. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  If one thinks at it in this way, Conservatives and the Constitution is in dialogue with important theories of constitutional regimes and constitutional change like Bruce Ackerman’s. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Or BassokIn a recent post, Neil Siegel describes a “major concern expressed during the partisan gerrymandering litigation before the Supreme Court over the past two terms”— “that the Court’s public legitimacy may suffer if it holds that federal courts may adjudicate the merits of political gerrymandering claims. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 10:30 am by Paul Caron
Bruce Ackerman (Yale), The Constitutional Critiques of Elizabeth Warren’s Wealth Tax Plan Are Absurd Axios, Filthy Rich, Owing No Tax Baker Institute for Public Policy, Fiscal Federalism and the State and Local Tax Deduction Limit Bloomberg, Democrats Embrace Tax-the-Rich Label After Years of Ducking It Bloomberg, How High-Tax Countries Tax... [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 2:00 pm by Ilya Somin
" In fact, as Yale Law School professor Bruce Ackerman explains, longstanding laws bar the use of troops for domestic law enforcement (including enforcing immigration law). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm by Ilya Somin
Bruce Ackerman outlines some reasons why it would be illegal for Trump to use an emergency declaration to build the wall: President Trump on Friday said that he was considering the declaration of a "national emergency" along the border with Mexico, which he apparently believes would allow him to divert funds from the military budget to pay for a wall, and to use military personnel to build it... [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by Guest Blogger
 Some critics, including my colleague Bruce Ackerman, have leapt too quickly to the conclusion that such a move would be lawless and might even subject wall-builders to criminal prosecution. [read post]