Search for: "Bruce Ackerman"
Results 101 - 120
of 510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 6:02 am
Professor Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law has argued for a simple conclusion: he thinks that the Counsel to the President is a world-class enabler, the President’s yes-man or -woman, and that the position should be abolished. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 4:30 am
As Bruce Ackerman has eloquently written, the current structure of the military leadership does create a risk to civilian control. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 7:01 am
Bruce Ackerman attached a brief he authored with David Remes on behalf of Captain Nathan Smith, arguing that the United States’ ongoing operations against the Islamic State are illegal. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 12:20 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Bruce Ackerman flagged the latest brief filed by U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 7:08 am
Bruce Ackerman excoriated a brief by the government that sought to dismiss a lawsuit by his client, Captain Nathan Smith, claiming that the United States’ ongoing war against the Islamic State is unconstitutional in the absence of a new AUMF. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 12:15 pm
Bruce Ackerman, one of Smith’s lawyers, posted a response on Lawfare. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
Yesterday, Andrew Ackerman of the WSJ reported, these two nominations were delayed even further by the Senate when an unidentified Democratic Senator moved to block any confirmation vote on Peirce through a procedural step known as a “hold. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:28 am
Even those who see no hope in this regard – for example, those who dismiss Bruce Ackerman’s suit asking a judge to rule the war on ISIS unconstitutional or at least a violation of the War Powers Revolution as likeliest to strengthen the executive’s hand —should consider the deeper syndrome Danner is anxious about. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:12 am
(Yale), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), Akhil Amar (Yale), Bruce Ackerman (Yale) and Lawrence Lessig (Harvard). [read post]
13 May 2016, 11:12 am
As Bruce Ackerman put it, the lawsuit is aimed at forcing the ISIS authorization issue “back on the agenda. [read post]
7 May 2016, 7:32 am
Bruce Ackerman highlighted some key points in Captain Nathan Smith’s lawsuit against President Obama. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm
Yesterday, airstrikes struck a refugee camp in the northern Syrian province of Idlib, killing more than 30 people. [read post]
5 May 2016, 1:43 pm
” Yale Law School’s Bruce Ackerman weighs in on whether America’s war on the Islamic State is illegal in the New York Times and on Lawfare. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:03 am
“We want to get this back on the agenda,” says another of Captain Smith’s attorneys, Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
It is a review essay of Bruce Ackerman’s Civil Rights Revolution (2014) and Jed Handelsman Shugerman’s People's Courts (2012): In the course of reviewing Jed Shugerman's The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America and Bruce Ackerman's The Civil Rights Revolution, we argue for a reassessment of the way that scholars think about popular constitutionalism. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm
Security expert Bruce Schneier writes an article in the Washington Post explaining why Apple's position on FBI-OS is correct. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
Meanwhile, liberal Yale Law School professors Bruce Ackerman and Jack Balkin, among others, have excoriated the Obama administration for ignoring and thus undermining the Office of Legal Counsel, one of the few independent internal checks on the exercise of unconstitutional authority by the president. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
University of Texas on behalf of some of the nation’s leading constitutional law scholars, including Professors Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, Eric Schnapper, and Adam Winkler, as bad, revisionist history. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 10:00 am
”Our brief, filed on behalf of [the Constitutional Accountability Center] and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars—Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, Eric Schnapper, and Adam Winkler—demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit the government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Our brief, filed on behalf of CAC and six of the nation’s most prominent constitutional scholars—Bruce Ackerman, Jack Balkin, Burt Neuborne, James Ryan, Eric Schnapper, and Adam Winkler—demonstrates that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment permit the government to take race into account in certain circumstances in order to ensure equality of opportunity for all persons regardless of race. [read post]
