Search for: "Bruce Boyden" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
By Ethan Ackerman Just as Bruce Boyden seriously asks, "is the case for contracts somehow expanding copyright rights vastly overstated? [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
I'm interested in a narrower point (one also raised by regular Prawfs reader Bruce Boyden in TFL comments): A few comments over there have suggested that these bloggers have done something unlawful in passing along and/or using email addresses and other information to identify the unknown commenters. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm by James Grimmelmann
Bruce Boyden nailed it when he guessed I was thinking about termination of transfers. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 5:28 am by Terry Hart
Copyright’s Substantial Confusion — Marquette University Law School professor Bruce Boyden begins a long journey examining the test for determining copyright infringement. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:13 am by Jeff Lipshaw
I started to write a comment to Bruce's very interesting post, but it started to get long and then I realized I'm a guest blogger. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 10:12 am
Dan Solove’s recent post about David Lat and Facebook and Bruce Boyden’s post about the possible destruction of Nabokov’s unpublished novel raise some questions. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:04 pm by Donn Zaretsky
In the comments, Bruce Boyden adds, "based on the photographs I've seen, it seems a good candidate for Arnstein v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:50 pm
The NYT's Jennifer Schuessler was there.And Marquette's Bruce Boyden has the fourth in his series of posts on the dispute, this time looking at "two intriguing mysteries" in the case: (1) which photograph the work is based on and (2) how the image was created (i.e., "whether Fairey simply photoshopped the Garcia photo, or rather created the poster by hand"). [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:30 am
Finally in the blogosphere, Doug Kmiec has this to say on Slate’s new legal blog, Convictions, and, here at Concurring Opinions, Bruce Boyden wonders “Where’s Lexington and Concord in D.C. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:03 am by Dan Markel
And returning back to the fold are a number of friendly and familiar faces: Bruce Boyden and Michael O'Hear, both from Marquette; Marc DeGirolami, from St. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:03 am by Michael M. O'Hear
In case you missed them the first time around, here are a handful of posts from our first couple of months that are still well worth reading today: David Papke on the classic 1L film The Paper Chase; Bruce Boyden on work-life balance and legal practice; Judi McMullen on fear of sex offenders; Lisa Mazzie on laptops in the classroom; and Jessica Slavin on the law professor who influenced her the most. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:38 pm by Nancy Rapoport
This sentence makes it clear that I'm very angry because there is some trivial difference in our world-views.Posted by: Bruce Boyden | Feb 17, 2010 1:39:22 PMThis sentence is not self-referential except to the extent that it is.Posted by: Matthew Reid Krell | Feb 17, 2010 1:55:25 PM Bravo to Paul Horwitz for the post! [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:29 am
Let me also welcome back to the conversation our friends: Adil Haque (a rising crim prawf at Rutgers Newark); my beloved FSU colleagues, Lesley Wexler (public int'l law) and Brian "He's funny for a tax guy" Galle (visiting at Georgetown this year); Brooks Holland (crim at Gonzaga); James Grimmelmann (law and technology at NYLS); Bruce Boyden (IP at Marquette); and Adam Kolber (law and neuroethics/crim, San Diego, visiting at Brooklyn this fall). [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:15 pm
"Also, Bruce Boyden has the second in a series of posts on the case, this one looking at the question who owns the allegedly infringed photo (note that, in the passage quoted above, Picker assumes it's Garcia, the photographer, and not the AP): "If Garcia is correct, there aren't any signed agreements one way or the other here, so it all comes down to whether he was an 'employee' at the time he took the photo. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:08 am by Mike Madison
Updated (later on 2/14): Bruce Boyden posted a three-part analysis of SOPA on way back in November and December 2011, ages before things really heated up in earnest.  [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:58 am
" Garcia claims that he (not the AP) owns the copyright in the photo.As Marquette's Bruce Boyden noted back in February, "it all comes down to whether [Garcia] was an [AP] 'employee' at the time he took the photo. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 5:33 am by Terry Hart
” The Legal Process Sea-Change — Third in a series of posts (Part one and part two) from Bruce Boyden that ostensibly began with the 9th Circuit’s Blurred Lines decision but has now taken us to judicial schools of thought in the 1950s. [read post]