Search for: "Bruce Boyden"
Results 41 - 60
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 7:43 pm
Along similar lines, Bruce Boyden suggested Section 114(d), which deals with webcasting, but weighs in at a mere 7000 words. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm
Bruce Boyden nailed it when he guessed I was thinking about termination of transfers. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:10 pm
(Or perhaps Bruce Boyden or Greg Lastowka will beat me to it.) [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:03 am
In case you missed them the first time around, here are a handful of posts from our first couple of months that are still well worth reading today: David Papke on the classic 1L film The Paper Chase; Bruce Boyden on work-life balance and legal practice; Judi McMullen on fear of sex offenders; Lisa Mazzie on laptops in the classroom; and Jessica Slavin on the law professor who influenced her the most. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:04 pm
" In the comments, Bruce Boyden adds, "based on the photographs I've seen, it seems a good candidate for Arnstein v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 1:52 pm
In the comments, Bruce Boyden says "if the other works in suit are like the 3 featured in the article, she’s going to make Nichols v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:43 pm
I believe only Bruce Boyden and Tom Swift objected.Here are a few additional thoughts on the matter. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
A point raised in the comments by Bruce Boyden (who apparently doesn't care for "snarky" responses to academic temper tantrums) is critical: Prestige for legal scholars is largely accorded by other legal scholars. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:28 am
Bruce E. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
Stacey Dogan and Wendy Gordon, Functionality Dogan: Project: IP protection for product design more generally; functionality is a key concept here, and on the copyright side separability. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:13 am
I started to write a comment to Bruce's very interesting post, but it started to get long and then I realized I'm a guest blogger. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:05 am
Bruce Boyden blogs: ... there has been an explosion of activity in recent decades of legal scholars shooting off in all different directions trying to establish colonies of legal scholarship grounded in other methods -- a bit like a well-fed spider plant. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:03 am
And returning back to the fold are a number of friendly and familiar faces: Bruce Boyden and Michael O'Hear, both from Marquette; Marc DeGirolami, from St. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:37 am
The seven IP professors' brief, by Marquette Law professor Bruce Boyden, argues that the district court did not properly consider the "red flags" of infringement standard. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:46 am
. * Evan Brown * Mike Masnick * Bruce Boyden ___ Venkat's comments: I don't know when people will learn the "never post anything online that will be inconsistent with the story you're planning to tell others" lesson. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
Seventh Breakout Session Liability and Digital Technology Steven Hetcher, Vanderbilt Law School The Death of Strict Liability in Copyright Proposal: Recognizing a fault standard for amateur-generated copyright. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Senior IP Scholar Session Paul Goldstein, Stanford Law School A lot of the industry-specific provisions of copyright have no present justification and should be tossed (e.g., cable licensing); mature industry likes settled rules, but that’s not good enough. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:35 am
The winner of the PrawfsPuzzler flip-flop puzzle contest is Marquette Law School's Bruce Boyden, who e-mailed all the correct answers last night. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:03 pm
"In the comments, Marquette's Bruce Boyden says the fair use issue "is difficult, particularly under existing law. 1) There are lots of cases out there that seem to suggest that putting an artwork somewhere in the frame is not fair use as long as the artwork is recognizable (the Seven case, the pinball case, Ringgold, Woods, the Devil’s Advocate case). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:38 pm
This sentence makes it clear that I'm very angry because there is some trivial difference in our world-views.Posted by: Bruce Boyden | Feb 17, 2010 1:39:22 PMThis sentence is not self-referential except to the extent that it is.Posted by: Matthew Reid Krell | Feb 17, 2010 1:55:25 PM Bravo to Paul Horwitz for the post! [read post]
