Search for: "Bruce v. Bruce" Results 81 - 100 of 3,270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2023, 8:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a June 29, 2023, decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Michael S. Knoll
And the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Loughlin recognizes the centrality of Reconstruction to American constitutionalism (see his discussion of Bruce Ackerman’s work (p. 146–47)). [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction One of the key ideas in contemporary economic theory in general and law and economics in particular is the social welfare function. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
  Rottman joined Lawfare Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes to go through the document carefully: the long history that led to it, the shifting policies that have gotten more restrictive over the years since the Supreme Court ruled in Branzburg v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Former federal Liberal political staffer Bruce Lehrmann has dropped his defamation case against News Corp after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 8:54 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: Alison Duxbury, Connecting Scholarship and Practice in International Humanitarian Law: A Tribute to Professor Bruce Oswald CSC Christopher Greenwood, The Practical Reality and Efficacy of International Humanitarian Law: Some Reflections Helen Durham & Anne Quintin, At the Crossroads: Multi-Stakeholder and Multi-Disciplinary Approaches in the Application of IHL Sean D. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
  On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:35 am by Amy Howe
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]