Search for: "Bruce v. Martin" Results 81 - 100 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
MARTIN, DROUGHT AND TORRES, INC., ET AL.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04-07-00342-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-31-07) as reinstated08-0266LEE, WAI-LING v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:12 am by New Books Script
HD 3616 G73 B28 2012 Understanding regulation : theory, strategy, and practice Robert Baldwin, Martin Cave, Martin Lodge. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
” Ryan cited US v Bruce as standing for the proposition that “violation of an ethical obligation does not in and of itself give rise to a conflict of interest unless it involves the attorney putting his own interests in conflict with his client’s. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
Bruce, 396 F.3d 697 (6th Cir. 2/3/05), vacated in part by 405 F.3d 1034 (6th Cir. 2005), most cases saw remand under Booker. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by SHG
  From Shaun Martin's California Appellate Report (via the once formidable Legal Blog Watch, which now consists of Bruce Carton's musings if he gets a free moment), comes People v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:55 am by Bryn Miller
Martin on behalf of the California State Association of Counties and 33 cities and counties. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
In reference to the September 2020 incident, Master Bruce Elwood found that there had been a “serious and troubling incident of family violence” on the father’s part, “both in terms of the emotional and physical safety of the mother, but also in [the child’s] best interests” (at para 43). [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 2:57 am
Case Name: Williams Production RMT Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers, Journalism and regulation There were two published PCC adjudications this week: Martin Sewell v The Cambridge Student: A clause 1 complaint in respect of an online story accusing a Cambridge University research associate of having “explicitly endorsed National Socialism” was upheld. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 4:45 am by Yishai Schwartz
Mark Martins, responding to allegations that the Guantanamo trial proceedings are too secretive. [read post]