Search for: "Brussel v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2015, 4:15 am by Timothy Edgar
  Brussels bureaucrats can freely bash the United States for surveillance their own governments practice, as long as it serves their interests. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
For example, in the United Kingdom, widespread (adverse) publicity in the legal profession followed the English High Court's decision in J P Morgan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:44 am by Lawrence Solum
She draws comparisons with the European approach to jurisdiction under the European Regulation (now the Brussels Recast) and explains why the overall jurisdictional regime in the United States may be substantially more limited than in other countries. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
More importantly, within the EU anti-suit injunctions are incompatible with the Brussels I Regulation (cf. the ECJ decision in Turner v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:09 am
United States, 495 U. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
The agreement contained a clause conferring exclusive jurisdiction on a court in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:42 am
 It did not, therefore, refer to the ECJ's observation in para. 28 of its judgment in Owusu v Jackson (Case C-281/02) that: [T]he rules of the Brussels Convention on exclusive jurisdiction or express prorogation of jurisdiction are also likely to be applicable to legal relationships involving only one Contracting State and one or more non-Contracting States. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:41 am by Joel R. Brandes
    In West v Dobrev, 2013 WL 5813749 (10th Cir, 2013) Petitioner West, a lawyer, was a citizen of Romania and the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:31 am by Ryan Scoville
Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty obliges the United States and its signatories (twenty-eight member countries in total) to collective defense in the event one of the member states is attacked. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:39 am by Jon
Union with the United States  would make some sense. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 8:32 am by Stewart Baker
  Alan and I talk about one more PlayPen decision, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
As between States of the United States, the giving of such res judicata effect is required by full faith and credit.It’s interesting to watch European solutions to problems of federalism converge, at least in this instance, on US solutions! [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 8:31 am
I am nearing the end of a two-week Fulbright German Studies Program in Brussels and Berlin. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm by Timothy Edgar
 When content is located inside the United States, it cannot be collected except by order of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:30 am by EEM
Europe's Role as a Global Actor in Promoting Solutions to Long Lasting Refugee Crises, Brussels, 20 March 2013 [info] - Organized by ECRE, IRC and DRC.Publications: Best Interests of Child and Dublin II (Free Movement, Feb. 2013) [text] - Reference to MA & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:44 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
In a case where the Hague Convention should apply rather than the Brussels Ia Regulation because one of the parties is resident in a non-EU Contracting State to the Convention even though the chosen court is in a Member State of the EU (See Article 26(6)(a) of the Hague Convention) one would expect Article 6 of the Convention to be applied by any non-chosen court in the EU. [read post]