Search for: "Brussel v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2015, 4:15 am
Brussels bureaucrats can freely bash the United States for surveillance their own governments practice, as long as it serves their interests. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
For example, in the United Kingdom, widespread (adverse) publicity in the legal profession followed the English High Court's decision in J P Morgan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
In this respect, European merger control law reflected U.S. antitrust law at or around the time of United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
More importantly, within the EU anti-suit injunctions are incompatible with the Brussels I Regulation (cf. the ECJ decision in Turner v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:42 am
 It did not, therefore, refer to the ECJ's observation in para. 28 of its judgment in Owusu v Jackson (Case C-281/02) that: [T]he rules of the Brussels Convention on exclusive jurisdiction or express prorogation of jurisdiction are also likely to be applicable to legal relationships involving only one Contracting State and one or more non-Contracting States. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
The agreement contained a clause conferring exclusive jurisdiction on a court in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:09 am
United States, 495 U. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:24 am
United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:41 am
In West v Dobrev, 2013 WL 5813749 (10th Cir, 2013) Petitioner West, a lawyer, was a citizen of Romania and the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 3:48 am
United States of America v. [read post]
Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, Germaninvestments AG, v. Allomet Corp., Docket No. 291, 2019
4 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
(Hldg.) v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty obliges the United States and its signatories (twenty-eight member countries in total) to collective defense in the event one of the member states is attacked. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
[i] V. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:39 am
Union with the United States would make some sense. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 8:32 am
Alan and I talk about one more PlayPen decision, United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
The latter provision states that jurisdiction over parental responsibility issues should be transferred to the courts where the child has acquired a new habitual residence and one of the alternative conditions set out in the said provision is satisfied (SS v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
As between States of the United States, the giving of such res judicata effect is required by full faith and credit.It’s interesting to watch European solutions to problems of federalism converge, at least in this instance, on US solutions! [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 8:31 am
I am nearing the end of a two-week Fulbright German Studies Program in Brussels and Berlin. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:38 am
Blake subsequently settled in the United States for a few months with the child. [read post]
