Search for: "Brussel v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
’s position on the global stage than other candidates. [46] V. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am by Matthias Weller
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm by Timothy Edgar
 When content is located inside the United States, it cannot be collected except by order of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:44 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
In a case where the Hague Convention should apply rather than the Brussels Ia Regulation because one of the parties is resident in a non-EU Contracting State to the Convention even though the chosen court is in a Member State of the EU (See Article 26(6)(a) of the Hague Convention) one would expect Article 6 of the Convention to be applied by any non-chosen court in the EU. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:30 am by EEM
Europe's Role as a Global Actor in Promoting Solutions to Long Lasting Refugee Crises, Brussels, 20 March 2013 [info] - Organized by ECRE, IRC and DRC.Publications: Best Interests of Child and Dublin II (Free Movement, Feb. 2013) [text] - Reference to MA & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:50 pm by Larry
United States is one of those cases only a lawyer would love or would hate, depending on which side of the dispute you happen to be. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
” He had previously visited the United States in 1962 and 1968 even though, by statute, his political beliefs rendered him inadmissible. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 12:23 pm
when I read this snippet from a report about Live Earth: Given a choice of four major issues before the United States today, 36% named the war in Iraq as most important. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am by Jan von Hein
This ruling indicates the unexpected albeit preferable obiter dictum that the Brussels II bis Regulation applies on declaratory decisions concerning private divorces issued by Member States’ authorities. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
the smallest saleable patent practising unit (SSPPU) (see Kat friend Richard Vary's comment in the last update here). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Brussels effect is a decision to conform private behavior to a single standard v. uncoordinated legal regimes following other regimes to convergence. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest post by Shubha Ghosh and Erika Ellyne This post compares and contrasts the United States approach to patentable subject after last term’s Alice v CLS decision, with that in the European Union. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
If Question 1.3 is answered in the affirmative: Which criteria are to be used to determine whether jurisdiction under Article 5(3) of the Brussels I Regulation is established where a trade mark granted in the State of the court seised is used as an AdWord on a search engine website with a country-specific top-level domain different from that of the State of the court seised? [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am by Jan von Hein
Especially with regard to the judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters and the recast of the Brussels I Regulation, the United Kingdom is at the verge of forfeiting the benefit of the harmonized recognition and enforcement of the decisions by its courts in other Member States. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:34 pm by Joel R. Brandes
At the time, Respondent did not communicate with Petitioner regarding his decision to keep the children in the United States. [read post]