Search for: "Bryan Garner" Results 1 - 20 of 783
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2020, 3:58 am by China Law Blog
Reading, listening, and watching recommendations from: Patricia Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges, by Antonin Scalia and Bryan A. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am by Peter Margulies
(Scalia's classic study, "Reading Law," co-authored with Bryan Garner, makes the same point.) [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 am by Podetize
I credit Bryan Garner with heightening my interest in this when he was sti [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:39 am
Garner has been advocating for placing citations in footnotes. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:52 am by Bob Ambrogi
I t also suggests style tips from The Red Book: A Manual On Legal Style by Bryan Garner and The Elements of Style by Strunk & White. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am by Neil Kinkopf
It is not surprising, therefore, that Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner’s catalog of clear-statement rules in their treatise on statutory interpretation, “Reading Law,” does not mention this particular rule. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:05 am by Ilya Somin
Among the many notable works on the subject of precedent, I recommend recent books by Randy Kozel and Bryan Garner, and this article by Larry Solum. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:21 pm by Leslie Pardo
We have gathered resources from the American Bar Association and experts such as Bryan Garner and ASU Law Professors Judith Stinson, Charles Calleros, and Kimberly Holst to help you improve your legal analysis, clarity, and structure, whether you are writing for a professor who swears by CREAC, CRuPAC, or even IRAAAPC. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
From John Rastell’s Termes de la Ley in the sixteenth century to Bryan A. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:54 am by Danielle D'Onfro
” Thomas then turns to Scalia and Bryan Garner’s book, “Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts,” to support the claim that “[i]t is a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation that ‘absent provision[s] cannot be supplied by the courts. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am by Peter Margulies
Consider that Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner, in their classic study of statutory interpretation, “Reading Law,” highlighted the venerable canon that holds that statutes in pari materia (i.e., addressing the same topic) should be interpreted “harmoniously” (p. 252). [read post]