Search for: "Bryant v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:00 am by Ryan Scoville
” As readers know, it’s difficult for the executive to prevail in traditional Category 3 cases, but Zivotofsky v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:45 am by Jake Lebsack
  First, it only applies to “any person within the United States,” so spoofed calls initiated outside the United States are not covered. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 1:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, gender-selection abortions are also common in some communities in the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, which challenged Congress’s constitutional power to take land into trust under the Indian Reorganization Act. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Bryant, an equal-protection challenge by a Mississippi municipal judge to the state’s inclusion of the emblem in its official flag, comes from Linley Sanders at Newsweek. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court at one time interpreted the clause to bar admission of out-of-court statements that lacked adequate indicia of reliability (Ohio v. [read post]