Search for: "Bryson v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
A criminal investigation counts (see, United States v Rodgers, 466 US 475 [1984]). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
United States) that threw everything into flux: My summary op-ed of the issue and my reasons for why Congress should just "do nothing. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division concurred with the Supreme Court’s ruling noting that “The giving of false statements in the course of an official investigation has been upheld as a ground for dismissal from municipal employment," citing Duncan v Kelly, 43 AD3d 297, affirmed 9 NY3d 1024.As the United States Supreme Court held in Bryson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 11:36 am by Gene Quinn
Particularly interesting is that the Federal Court of Australia went out of their way to question the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court, and say that it is exceptionally difficult to reconcile Diamond v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This article was sponsored by the United States Air Force, a Presidential Young Investiga- tor Award, and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:26 am
. - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a showing of good cause was sufficient to support parties' requests to file documents under seal. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:37 pm by Gene Quinn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a decision in Novozymes v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am by Hans Sauer
Insiders React to Supreme Court Prometheus DecisionJust over three weeks ago the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]