Search for: "Buchanan v. Downing"
Results 1 - 20
of 175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2017, 6:20 am
Supreme Court struck down Louisville’s race-based zoning ordinance in a landmark case, Buchanan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:42 am
As, I might add, did the defendant.Here's how the traffic stop went down:"In July 2020, Officers Dorin Buchanan and Patrick Marshal pulled over Victor Ramirez after witnessing him speed in a residential neighborhood, fail to stop at a stop sign, and not use a turn signal. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:26 pm
There are many more citations to Olson and Downs in my work than Buchanan. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Even though the Supreme Court struck down race-based land use controls over a hundred years ago in Buchanan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
Buchanan & Michael C. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
As I thought about the question of whether we should put more poor people into owner-occupied houses, or instead move more non-poor people out of owner-occupied houses, it suddenly struck me that we might be looking at another example of the "leveling up or leveling down" question.That question was most famously raised in the Supreme Court's 1971 Palmer v. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 2:13 pm
In her seriously flawed recent book Democracy in Chains, historian Nancy MacLean argues that James Buchanan and many other libertarians are anti-democratic and that their supposed opposition to Brown v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
The Tyler v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
The Tyler v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:13 am
Buchanan, 2008 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 6:24 am
It applies to trademarks like the following: “Down with racists,” “Down with sexists,” “Down with homophobes. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:27 pm
The Plaintiff fell down and suffered a fractured hip. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 12:24 pm
(Plus it's got all those confusing "Bishop v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
He was wrong that that case should stand in the way of Congress, but he was wrong in a way that is both understandable and that might point to a way for motivated Supreme Court conservatives to block Congress’s possible future policy choice.In 1920, the Supreme Court held 5-4 in favor of the taxpayer in the now-infamous Eisner v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:03 pm
According to a recent decision handed down by the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
If the Court strikes down the subsidies in the affected states, what would happen next? [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:45 pm
So it was a process of winnowing down the rich documentary material that exists. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
In the case of Ramsey v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
The Republicans could demand, say, a constitutional amendment overruling Roe v. [read post]
