Search for: "Buchanan v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment states that “[t]he validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:49 am
2011AP830-CR State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:16 pm
Buchanan, 190 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1966), for vacating a foreclosure sale apply when adequacy of the bid price is not at issue? [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:16 pm
Buchanan, 190 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1966), for vacating a foreclosure sale apply when adequacy of the bid price is not at issue? [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
Then in Buchanan v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
American Bush v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:15 pm
"Ice Age: Continental Drift" is not "A Streetcar Named Desire," but it is better than re-reading Marbury v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm
Also worthy is Buchanan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
The Court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The maximum fee under legal aid to which Marshall's solicitor was entitled was £535, but an account of expenses produced for the sheriff showed work to date of £1,819.20 and a future estimate of £503.65.Sheriff Morrison agreed that, unlike the case of Buchanan v McLean, appealed to the Privy Council in 2001, the argument could not be said to be premature, and the test to apply was whether there was or would be "actual or inevitable prejudice to the… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
The maximum fee under legal aid to which Marshall's solicitor was entitled was £535, but an account of expenses produced for the sheriff showed work to date of £1,819.20 and a future estimate of £503.65.Sheriff Morrison agreed that, unlike the case of Buchanan v McLean, appealed to the Privy Council in 2001, the argument could not be said to be premature, and the test to apply was whether there was or would be "actual or inevitable prejudice to the… [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:10 am
(October 16 is the date on which the Court has set the Masterson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
The Court’s holding in Christopher v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
In the best-titled blog post ever, "Nest Eggs and Nests: A Brief Meditation on Neil Buchanan, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Arrow Securities, Unicorns, Zebras, Dogs, Fire Hydrants and ... [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:58 am
But there’s an elephant in the room: Whitehall Township v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:02 am
Of course, as a fan of Wickard v. [read post]
