Search for: "Buchanan v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by The Federalist Society
On February 26, 2013,  the Supreme Court heard the oral argument in Maryland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by The Federalist Society
On February 26, 2013,  the Supreme Court heard the oral argument in Maryland v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment states that “[t]he validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:16 pm by Robert C. Weill
Buchanan, 190 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1966), for vacating a foreclosure sale apply when adequacy of the bid price is not at issue? [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:16 pm by Robert C. Weill
Buchanan, 190 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1966), for vacating a foreclosure sale apply when adequacy of the bid price is not at issue? [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:15 pm
"Ice Age: Continental Drift" is not "A Streetcar Named Desire," but it is better than re-reading Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am by Rachel Sachs
The Court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am by Legal Beagle
The maximum fee under legal aid to which Marshall's solicitor was entitled was £535, but an account of expenses produced for the sheriff showed work to date of £1,819.20 and a future estimate of £503.65.Sheriff Morrison agreed that, unlike the case of Buchanan v McLean, appealed to the Privy Council in 2001, the argument could not be said to be premature, and the test to apply was whether there was or would be "actual or inevitable prejudice to the… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:44 am by Legal Beagle
The maximum fee under legal aid to which Marshall's solicitor was entitled was £535, but an account of expenses produced for the sheriff showed work to date of £1,819.20 and a future estimate of £503.65.Sheriff Morrison agreed that, unlike the case of Buchanan v McLean, appealed to the Privy Council in 2001, the argument could not be said to be premature, and the test to apply was whether there was or would be "actual or inevitable prejudice to the… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
In the best-titled blog post ever, "Nest Eggs and Nests: A Brief Meditation on Neil Buchanan, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Arrow Securities, Unicorns, Zebras, Dogs, Fire Hydrants and ... [read post]