Search for: "Buchanan v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 (“Buchanan”), the House of Lords decided by a 3:2 majority that the broad interpretation should be adopted. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 12:42 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
The Court will determine whether the Supreme Court should depart from the judgment of the House of Lords in James Buchanan & Co. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court has offered snippets of its view on this in some cases, stating in Fleming v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
But Art.1 states only Congress can borrow. [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:04 am
(Train v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
Buchanan and Michael C. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:22 am
Buchanan and Michael C. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:11 am
What about Bush v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
DorfMy latest solo Verdict column (by contrast with the various debt-ceiling columns I've been co-authoring with Prof Buchanan) offers an animal-welfare-centric view of last week's SCOTUS decision in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:24 am
Buchanan Almost exactly a year ago, I wrote a column here on Dorf on Law that I described as a "mental health break. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
Such a lawsuit could concede that notwithstanding the Supreme Court's invalidation of the Line Item Veto Act in Clinton v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:08 am
And although the one Supreme Court case to address the underpinnings of Amd14, 1935's Perry v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:52 am
In Buchanan v Law Offs. of Sheldon E. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Thus, Egbert has no bearing on Disney's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against state officials (where both a federal statute and the doctrine of Ex Parte Young provide causes of action).Even so, as Prof Buchanan observed in his essay here yesterday, there is a prima facie similarity between Disney's lawsuit and the challenge to the third version of Trump's Travel Ban that SCOTUS rejected in Trump v. [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
