Search for: "Buchanan v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2015, 8:03 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
Accordingly, in late 1860 and early 1861, both the outgoing president, James Buchanan, and his successor, Abraham Lincoln, urged the states to apply for an Article V convention. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did not simply allow arbitrary actions by state actors—or not only that. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
The Republicans could demand, say, a constitutional amendment overruling Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Although the Republican governor of Texas ordered his own state guard to “monitor” the U.S. military while it is in his state (which is, of course, still one of the fifty united states that our armed forces protect), and even though the reliably unhinged Rep. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The violation here would be much clearer than the one the Supreme Court identified in Bush v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Herbin-Triant (University of Massachusetts Lowell) marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Buchanan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
Thus New Yorkers need not worry that police without warrants or cause could attach such devices to their vehicles in New York and record the vehicles' minute by minute location.In People v Buchanan (6/30/09) the Court again found that the New York Constitution provides protections that have not been clearly found under the United State Constitution. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
In the best-titled blog post ever, "Nest Eggs and Nests: A Brief Meditation on Neil Buchanan, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Arrow Securities, Unicorns, Zebras, Dogs, Fire Hydrants and ... [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:54 pm
United States stated: ""Nor can we perceive any reason for not considering the expression 'the validity of the public debt' as embracing whatever concerns the integrity of the public obligations." [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In other words, Roberts and Ginsburg were in unexpected positions.This reminded me of another Supreme Court case pertaining to state tax issues, 2015’s Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]