Search for: "Burchell v. Burchell" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2013, 9:18 am by J
I am doing the first whilst writing about the second.The case of Burchell v Raj Properties Ltd [2013] UKUT 433 (LC) is a notty little case. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 9:18 am by J
I am doing the first whilst writing about the second.The case of Burchell v Raj Properties Ltd [2013] UKUT 433 (LC) is a notty little case. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:35 am by Amanda Sanders
The decision is also of interest in so far as it lays a seed for the test in British Homes Stores Ltd v Burchell, which has long been regarded as the “classic formulation of the employer’s obligation in misconduct cases” to be challenged. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 2:16 pm
The UK decisions in Halsey v Milton Keynes NHS Trust and Burchell v Bullard undoubtedly reinforced robust judicial recommendations to mediateHere in my Friday mediation, there were much better odds available to all in other forums where this dispute was always destined to be played out. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:51 pm by Jan Neels
A similar view was recently adopted in Burchell v Anglin 2010 3 SA 48 (ECG), in the context of cross-border defamation. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:49 am by eleanorleydon
The second point of public importance was whether the approach to be taken by a tribunal under s98(1)-(4) laid down in British Homes Stores Ltd v Burchell (Note) [1978] is correct: Even in relation to the first part of the inquiry, as to the reason for the dismissal, the Burchell approach can lead to dismissals which were in fact fair being treated as unfair and dismissals which were in fact unfair being treated as fair. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 2:39 am by Jan Neels
The recent decision of the Eastern Cape High Court in Grahamstown (South Africa) in Burchell v Anglin 2010 3 SA 48 (ECG) deals with cross-border defamation in a commercial context. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
 Burchell has nevertheless acquired authoritative status, initially through its approval (as an unreported case) by this court in Weddel and Co v Tepper [1980] ICR 286, and more recently by its endorsement in the judgment of Mummery LJ in Foley v Post Office [2000] ICR 1283. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
 Burchell has nevertheless acquired authoritative status, initially through its approval (as an unreported case) by this court in Weddel and Co v Tepper [1980] ICR 286, and more recently by its endorsement in the judgment of Mummery LJ in Foley v Post Office [2000] ICR 1283. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:12 pm by Rosalind English
Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch) - read judgment  Turner v East Midlands Trains [2012] EWCA Civ 1470 - read judgment Two employment cases, about Facebook and train tickets respectively, indicate the difficulties of deciding where human rights may or may not be raised in disputes between private parties – neither defendant in these cases was a public authority.  [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Last year the law faculty at Penn State approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law".  [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 8:25 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Enlarged version Historic Events Newspaper Collection, Serial and Government Publications Division (84); reproduced in Library of Congress, "With an Even Hand":  Brown v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution:  The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]