Search for: "Bureau of Economic Analysis v. Long"
Results 21 - 40
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
In 1928, in his dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 8:06 am
Rubbie, a single mother of four and a plaintiff in the ACLU's case Adkins v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
In those cases, a per se rule has been adopted because economic analysis indicates that these types of practices in general pose such a high risk of net anticompetitive harm that a rule-of-reason inquiry is likely to fail a cost-benefit test almost all of the time. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
For Vermeule, the common good requires a strong administrative state under modern conditions, as long as it is operating for good results, and it is difficult to contend that the SEC is not acting to [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:12 pm
In her opinion, the resulting proposal is a “balanced set of provisions” “grounded in common sense” and resulting from “rigorous economic market analysis” created “deliberately and transparently” through the Bureau’s rulemaking process over the past five years. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:06 am
In concluding its analysis, the Court of Appeals observed as follows, “The Supreme Court has never required that a statute be a ‘comprehensive economic regulatory scheme’ or a ‘comprehensive regulatory scheme for economic activity’ in order to pass muster under the Commerce Clause. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> National Environmental Dev v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
Boesch proposed that the economic security created by the emergency paid leave programs demonstrates that paid leave programs must cover all workers and ensure both short- and long-term leave, flexible durations and automatic triggers, adequate wages for all types of leave, and employment protection for those on leave. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
But some impairment would be tolerable, so long as it isn't "so essential to the use or economic value of their property that the state-authorized limitation of it amounted to a 'taking.'" Id. at 84. [191] Glendale Assocs., Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:35 am
In American Farm Bureau v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
And three years are but three years; that is, not that long and not enough cases to make much of a trend, one way or the other. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> NRDC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm
Of interest, on April 17, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform may hold a hearing on “The SEC’s Aversion to Cost-Benefit Analysis. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
And there are hints that the Bay State’s voters care about this too, for the single rate income tax has had staying power, long favored by residents. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
The president may well pardon Flynn, as he has long hinted. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
