Search for: "Burford v. Sun Oil Co"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
The doctrine is named after Burford v Sun Oil Co., a 1943 decision in which the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943); R.R. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:09 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943) and Colorado River Water Conservation District v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:03 am
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943) (The Burford Doctrine) in dismissing the Federal claim. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Finally, the plaintiffs argued that the court should decline to hear this putative class action under Burford v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
Sun Oil Co.) [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Sun Oil, Griffin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:20 am
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943), and plaintiffs appealed. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:15 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
Sun Oil. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:35 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315, 332-34, 63 S.Ct. 1098, 1106-07 (1943), on the grounds that judicial dissolution of corporations is a matter uniquely to be addressed by the New York state courts. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 7:32 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943) abstention might apply, but that isn't clear, either. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315, 63 S. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Sun Oil Co. (1943), federal courts should abstain from resolving a constitutional challenge to South Carolina's anti-gambling laws. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 8:15 am
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943), to let the parties sort out the issues in state court. [read post]