Search for: "Burgess v. Burgess" Results 1 - 20 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 2:32 pm by Gregory Forman
Every published opinion tells a story and the January 15, 2014 Court of Appeals opinion in Burgess v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
" Burgess pled guilty to a federal crack charge carrying 10-year mandatory minimum sentence, but that mandatory minimum sentence was doubled to 20 years based on a prior South Carolina misdemeanor drug conviction that carried a maximum sentence of two years. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:56 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
I don't have much time now, but I wanted to do a quick post about the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in Burgess v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:33 pm
Justice Ginsburg manages, in her brief opinion, to address and dispense with many of Burgess's key arguments. [read post]
29 May 2015, 12:48 am by JD Hull
As a follow-up to our Anthony Burgess post earlier this week and thanks to SoCal polymath in progress, lawyer's lawyer and friend Karen Heumann. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 7:07 am
We filed this  brief  on behalf of the petitioner in Burgess v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:16 am by Lesley Harrold
BIC UK Ltd v Burgess [2019] – employer appeal successful: retrospective amendment re-wrote history to an impermissible extent The Court of Appeal (CA) has unanimously ruled that a retrospective amendment to the deed and rules of the BIC UK Pension Scheme (the Scheme) was invalid. [read post]
22 May 2009, 10:40 pm
II BURGESS: A MOTHER'S EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ACTION FOR INJURY TO HER CHILD IS NOT SUBSUMED INTO HER NEGLIGENCE CAUSE OF ACTION The seminal case allowing a mother to assert direct victim emotional distress for injury to her child during birth is Burgess v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
The transcript of today’s argument in Burgess v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 7:48 am
On January 17, 2007, a petition for writ of certiorari was filed in the following case: Burgess v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:30 am
R v G (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) R v J (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) R (on the application of Ahmad) (Respondent) v Mayor and Burgesses of London Borough of Newham (Appellants) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]