Search for: "Burke v. State of New Mexico" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2020, 6:19 pm by Matt Cooper
New Mexico: In Donald Trump for President v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
-Mexico border from requesting asylum. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 7:47 pm by Sme
State of New Mexico (10th Cir., June 8, 2017) (affirming dismissal of 1983 and certain equal pay and whistleblower claims, reversing dismissal of whistleblower claim against one of the defendants in his official capacity, and remanding violation-of-privacy, wage discrimination, and whistleblowing claims) ERISA Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Here is the abstract: This Note uses the 1999 sunset and 2003 reauthorization of New Mexico’s public employee collective bargaining law to estimate the causal effect of teacher collective bargaining on student achievement. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:09 am by David DePaolo
” Minick and proponents argue that opt-out and non-subscription actually provide better protection for injured workers than state work comp systems.That point is highly debated by the opposition, largely on the grounds that in dispute resolution the cards are stacked against workers, and that the industry isn't very transparent, if at all, with work injury and recovery data - even resisting state efforts to expand reporting and data requirements.While the debate about… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:53 am by azatty
Attorney for the District of Arizona The news came out of the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 12:43 pm by Steve Hall
Many states determine mental capacity prior to trial, said Jim Ellis, a University of New Mexico law professor and the attorney who argued the U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Class 46) Trading Standards officers uses new inspection powers granted under Copyright, Designs and Patent Act (Out-Law)   United States US General IP legislation to watch in 2009 (Law360) IP cases to follow in 2009 (Law360) US Trade Representative issues statement on Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ContentAgenda) Does the Federal Circuit need a fresh viewpoint? [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:16 am
He stated his concerns regarding the majority's conclusion that statutes defining "inherent risks of skiing" in Colorado, New Mexico and Utah are a "potential source of guidance for both trial courts in acting on motions to dismiss/summary judgment, as well as for juries in their deliberations. [read post]