Search for: "Burrow-Giles Lithographic Company v. Sarony"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 10:29 pm
CASE BRIEFNapolean Sarony, a photographer, sued Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co., a printing company, for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act of 1874 (18 Stat. 78) when it attempted to sell 85,000 unauthorized copies of Sarony's Oscar Wilde No. 18 photograph.The 1790 Copyright Act explicitly protected any "map, [nautical] chart or book. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 2:30 am
This has been supported by US Supreme Court decisions in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony and Mazer v Stein where the Supreme Court required human authorship for copyright protection. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 2:30 am
This has been supported by US Supreme Court decisions in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony and Mazer v Stein where the Supreme Court required human authorship for copyright protection. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:48 am
” Compendium (Third) § 101.1(A); Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:48 am
” Compendium (Third) § 101.1(A); Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
While the Supreme Court has never squarely addressed the question of whether non-humans can be authors (many claims to the contrary notwithstanding), the district court found that “[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the [Supreme Court’s] conclusion that [photography] fell within the bounds of copyright” in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [4] See Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
§ 102(a)) [3] Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
It uses a process called “diffusion”, which starts with a pattern of random dots and gradually alters that pattern towards a final output.[10] DALL·E “trained” on approximately 650 million image-text pairs scraped from the internet, learning from that dataset the relationships between images and the words used to describe them.[11] But while OpenAI filtered out images for specific content, such as images that violate their content code including pornography and… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
It uses a process called “diffusion”, which starts with a pattern of random dots and gradually alters that pattern towards a final output.[10] DALL·E “trained” on approximately 650 million image-text pairs scraped from the internet, learning from that dataset the relationships between images and the words used to describe them.[11] But while OpenAI filtered out images for specific content, such as images that violate their content code including pornography and… [read post]
