Search for: "Burrows v. Burrows"
Results 41 - 60
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Eastern Division (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Strossen is the former president of the ACLU; Johnson has had a long career in elective office and as a trade negotiator.ICYMI: Vanessa Burrows, an FDA Historian, on why we need regulation, over at HNN. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
Burrows noted that “Protecting vulnerable workers from harassment, retaliation and other forms of discrimination is a key enforcement priority for the Commission as set forth in the EEOC’s most recent strategic enforcement plan …. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
Professor Justin Hughes points out in his work that Sarony was well known for posing his subjects.After Burrow-Giles comes Gross v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:31 am
Please see the UKSC Blog New Judgment post for Khan v Meadows here. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:16 am
According to the complaint in Burrows v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
Employers in states without such laws should closely watch Burrows v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
New Judgment: Barton and others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn-Jones (deceased) [2022] UKSC 3
25 Jan 2023, 2:39 am
Dissenting judgments Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows dissent and would both dismiss the appeal. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
L&Q -v- Ansell appears to state that, once the arrears and costs set out in the Possession Order have been paid, the occupier ceases to be a ‘tolerated trespasser’ in the sense of Burrows because their occupation is no longer subject to s.85 Housing Act 1985 - either in terms of execution of the order or possible application for variation of the order. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Contrary to Devereaux’s contention, the allegedly defamatory statement made by Burrows was not actionable because it was absolutely privileged as a matter of law (see Brady v Gaudelli, 137 AD3d 951, 952; El Jamal v Weil, 116 AD3d 732, 734; Bisogno v Borsa, 101 AD3d 780, 781; Kilkenny v Law Off. of Cushner & Garvey, LLP, 76 AD3d 512, 513), and does not support a finding of a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Seldon… [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
In support of their motion, the defendants submitted the transcript of the court proceeding setting forth the terms of the settlement of the underlying action, which conclusively established that the plaintiff was not coerced into settling (see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 757 [2014]; Pacella v Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, 14 AD3d 545 [2005]; Laruccia v Forchelli, Curto, Schwartz, Mineo, Carlino & Cohn, 295… [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:47 am
It has, today, been announced on the UK Supreme Court website that judgment in the case of Lloyd v Google will be handed down at 9.45 on Wednesday 10 November 2021. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:18 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bhamra v Dubb (t/a Lucky Caterers) [2010] EWCA Civ 13 (20 January 2010) G, R (on the application of) v X School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1 (20 January 2010) Supershield Ltd v Siemens Building Technologies FE Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 7 (20 January 2010) In the Pink Ltd v Leeds Magistrates Court & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 8 (20 January 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) B2net Ltd v HM Treasury (Sued As Buying… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:19 pm
Well, the Radmacher v Granatino case has certainly got family lawyers writing. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:24 am
[Jackson] A postmortem on Burrow v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
It invoked Burrow-Giles Lithographic v. [read post]
