Search for: "Burrows v. Burrows" Results 61 - 80 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2020, 4:58 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 In the Supreme Court, Lord Kerr, Lord Sales, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows heard the matter. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 7:31 am
So - having created the nonsense of tolerated trespassers in LB Brent v Burrows [1996] 1 WLR 1148, lets see if their Lordships can finally sort it out. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, finding that these allegations, even if proven, would not entitle the plaintiff to relief pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d at 1225-1226; Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [2014]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows &… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Sarony in SCt Burrow-Giles case neve… -> RT @IPLawAlerts: Who Owns the Patent? [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Burrows emphasises that the purpose of the advice or information is of central importance. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Knowsley HT v White, Honeyghan-Green v LB Islington & Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association [2008] UKHL 70 -   for anyone who hasn’t read it yet. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In support of their motion, the defendants submitted the transcript of the court proceeding setting forth the terms of the settlement of the underlying action, which conclusively established that the plaintiff was not coerced into settling (see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 757; Pacella v Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, 14 AD3d 545; Laruccia v Forchelli, Curto, Schwartz, Mineo, Carlino & Cohn, 295 AD2d 321, 322). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Moreover, the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations showing that, had he not settled, he would have obtained a more favorable outcome” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d at 1083; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293; Rau v… [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action for violations of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Ehrenkranz v 58 MHR, LLC, 159 AD3d 872, 872; Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759). [read post]