Search for: "Burrows v. Burrows"
Results 81 - 100
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2008, 1:58 pm
Rogers [1999] 32 HLR 361 and indeed Burrows v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:54 am
In April 2013, the Southern District of Florida preliminarily approved a proposed settlement in Burrows v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:48 am
Clayes, 72 S.W.2d 833, (MO Ct App 1934) and was recently revisited in Burrows v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
Burrows also urges employers to maintain DEI efforts. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
Burrows also urges employers to maintain DEI efforts. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:19 am
The main decision in this regard is Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony where the US Supreme Court confirmed that an author is “he to whom anything owes its origin; originator; maker; one who completes a work of science or literature”, which specifically can only be a human author. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:19 am
The main decision in this regard is Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony where the US Supreme Court confirmed that an author is “he to whom anything owes its origin; originator; maker; one who completes a work of science or literature”, which specifically can only be a human author. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:14 am
Supreme Court addressed the EEOC’s methods in the 2015 case Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:28 am
Although limited now, political burrowing into civil service jobs—a long prohibited practice—could become a routine endeavor every four years. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:37 am
Lord Burrows sets out the correct modern approach to statutory interpretation, which is that the court is concerned to identify the meaning of the words used by Parliament, and in so doing, the context and purpose of the provision or provisions are important. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
” For a slightly more detailed explanation, I’ll defer to Commissioner Lucas: “[EEOC] Chair Burrows unilaterally issued the ‘technical assistance’ document addressing the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:39 am
In Lusardi v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
The Office also relies heavily on Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am
Following the decision of the House of Lords, in Macmillan Inc v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 2:45 am
While Chair Burrows supported corporate DEI programs, Commissioner Lucas challenged corporations to review their DEI programs. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 2:45 am
While Chair Burrows supported corporate DEI programs, Commissioner Lucas challenged corporations to review their DEI programs. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:55 pm
App. 1993); Burrows v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm
Citizens Against Airport Pollution v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:50 pm
“Moreover, the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations showing that, had he not settled, he would have obtained a more favorable outcome” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C.,21 AD3d at 1083; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293; Rau v Borenkoff,262 AD2d at… [read post]
