Search for: "Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. that a company whose owners opposed contraception on religious grounds did not have to provide its employees insurance that covered contraception. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. in 2014 and the Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.[6] indeed protected conservative Christians who objected to funding what they viewed as coverage of abortion. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:45 pm by Ellena Erskine
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. from Gayle and Donald Wright, a couple who had dined with Justice Samuel Alito and his wife. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:09 am by Josh Blackman
Hobby Lobby Stores (2014), and Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by Josh Blackman
Hobby Lobby Stores (2014): "It seems to me appropriate, in joining the Court's opinion, to add these few remarks. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:00 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682, 706-707 (2014), corporations are defined as “persons” to provide protection for human beings. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At least since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v Pennsylvania...; Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc....), those cases were not decided under the First Amendment, but under the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993....The petitioners rely on language from Justice Gorsuch's concurrence in Masterpiece Cakeshop, joined by Justice Alito, which characterized the Smith rule as "controversial in many… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:39 pm by Howard Friedman
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014)- (dissenting opinion).Christian Legal Soc. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682, 728 (2014) ("The least-restrictive-means standard is exceptionally demanding[.] [read post]