Search for: "Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2014, 8:22 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.) addressing certain religious objections to such coverage. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:44 am by Anonymous
Among other rulings that came to national attention, is Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v Pennsylvania...; Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc....), those cases were not decided under the First Amendment, but under the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993....The petitioners rely on language from Justice Gorsuch's concurrence in Masterpiece Cakeshop, joined by Justice Alito, which characterized the Smith rule as "controversial in many… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court’s recent case of Burwell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:39 pm by Howard Friedman
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014)- (dissenting opinion).Christian Legal Soc. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 4:30 am by Unknown
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., most corporations are "persons" under the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am by John Eastman
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., its application of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to closely held corporations, and what the decision portends for the so-called accommodation for groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor that is currently being litigated. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 7:02 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm by Howard Friedman
Appx. 385 (2011) he joined a unanimous opinion that affirmed dismissal of a suit by a Muslim inmate who alleged that members of the Utah Board of Pardon and Parole decided to disfavor Muslims in parole decisions and to favor members of the Mormon church.⇾Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:16 am by Marcia Greenberger
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., in which the Court concluded two Terms ago, in a five-to-four decision, that certain closely held for-profit companies could be considered “persons” under RFRA. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:26 am by Jason Shinn
In this regard Justice Alito wrote: Our decision should not be understood to hold that an insurance-coverage mandate must necessarily fall if it conflicts with an employer’s religious beliefs … This decision was reached in what has come to be called the “Hobby Lobby” case, which is short-hand for Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. [read post]