Search for: "Bush Truck Leasing, Inc. v. Dynamex, Inc."
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Failing to prove any one of these criteria is enough to establish that the worker is an employee, and not an excluded independent contractor, for purposes of the wage order (Dynamex Operations West, Inc., April 30, 2018, Cantil-Sakauye, T.). [read post]
