Search for: "Bush v. U.s.*" Results 1 - 20 of 483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2010, 2:51 pm by Howard Wasserman
Today marks the tenth anniversary of Bush v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” On December 12, 2000, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 “per curiam” (non-specially authored) decision, Bush v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:42 am by Immigration Prof
Guest Post by Minyao Wang Last week a unanimous Ninth Circuit panel, composed of two judges appointed by the second President Bush and one judge appointed by President Obama, ruled in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:50 am
Bush have no reasonable expectation of privacy, a federal judge has ruled.In George Lardner v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:20 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Check out Howard Wasserman on George Will on Bush v. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:44 am
The most significant change is overturning the Supreme Court’s decision in Mosely v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:35 am
This morning the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals released an opinion in Al-Haramain Islamic v. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
In an earlier post, I discussed some of the constitutional issues involved in ACLU v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
  The Bush II  administration's  desire to be exempt from the FOIA  is made clear in its Motion for a Judgment on the Pleadings  (the  exhibits thereto are here, here, and here)  filed by the White House Office of Administration ("OAH")  against this FOIA Complaint of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ("CREW") in CREW v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:29 pm by Paul A. Prados
A lawsuit alleging high level conspiracy in the Bush administration has been filed in Fairfax County Circuit Court.The lawsuit is filed by former Special Counsel Scott Bloch who was allegedly forced out of his position in the waning days of the Bush administration. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:40 am by Steve Lubet
Plaintiffs readily acknowledge that their position also means that the Supreme Court’s decisions in Bush v. [read post]