Search for: "Butler v. Michigan" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2014, 6:24 pm by Jeanne M. Hannah
In Butler v Simmons-Butler, the Michigan Court of Appeals considered the issue whether a trial court has the authority to order a party to sign amended joint federal tax returns for prior years. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the state, Michigan Solicitor General Eric Restuccia began by emphasizing the Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Smita Ghosh
From the backwoods of rural Michigan to the nation’s capital. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, former Michigan governor John Engler urges the Court to grant cert. in Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:39 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Arnold, a pioneer woman aviator and longtime supporter of the ACLU of Virginia; and a different kind of basketball victory for girls and Title IX in Michigan. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The applicant accepted the expert opinion on the majority of the SARs mentioned in the permit, but questioned the position in relation to the Butler’s Gartersnake, Eastern Foxsnake and Colicroot. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
The federal appellate court also believed the state appellate court got the facts of Thompkins' interrogation wrong.The 6th Circuit relied on the prior and seminal SCOTUS decisions of Miranda v Arizona and North Carolina v Butler, which establish an accused individual's right to remain silent, and imposes a "heavy burden" on the state to demonstrate that a suspect, once advised of this right, has waived his privilege against self-incrimination.In reversing the 6th Circuit,… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:19 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
The federal appellate court also believed the state appellate court got the facts of Thompkins' interrogation wrong.The 6th Circuit relied on the prior and seminal SCOTUS decisions of Miranda v Arizona and North Carolina v Butler, which establish an accused individual's right to remain silent, and imposes a "heavy burden" on the state to demonstrate that a suspect, once advised of this right, has waived his privilege against self-incrimination.In reversing the 6th Circuit,… [read post]