Search for: "Butterworth v. Butterworth"
Results 1 - 20
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Butterworth v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
US v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:51 pm
A little late but no less welcome, the June 2007 issue of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property and Technology Cases has now been published. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 11:54 am
Third party media can change gagging order Here's a juicy tidbit from the LexisNexis Butterworth service - but not (so far) on any of the other subscription services: it's X and another v Persons unknown, a Queen's Bench Division from Mr Justice Eady this Wednesday. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:09 pm
Facts of the Case In the recent (unreported) case of Wess v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:25 am
Only two cases feature in the February 2007 issue of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property and Technology Cases - but they're both incredibly popular ones. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm
I know the court of appeal (and for that matter Tugendhat) quoted Strasbourg cases including Pfeifer v Austria – decided after Jameel – as authority for the proposition that Article 8 encompasses the right to reputation, but how much weight should it be given in a case dealing with defamatory allegations made against a public servant? [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 6:52 am
Latest IP&TThe August/September issue of Butterworths' Intellectual Property and Technology Cases has now been published. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Siobhain Butterworth is a lawyer. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:56 am
Civil litigation — Amended complaint — Wrongful discharge This case concerns the discharge of an at-will employee, allegedly because she did not appear for work timely on December 24, 2014, but instead attended a final peace order hearing as a respondent pursuant to § 3-1505 of the Maryland Code’s Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article in ... [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 2:11 am
The IPKat's copy of the January 2007 issue of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property and Technology Cases has now been received. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 5:20 pm
Minimax GMBH & Co v Chubb Fire Ltd, a Chancery Division decision from England and Wales, was handed down yesterday by Mr Justice Floyd. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:59 am
Roller Coaster Ride for Software WriterThe IPKat stumbled across Sawyer v Atari Interactive Inc, a Chancery Division decision of Mr Justice Cooke from 19 October, on the LexisNexis Butterworths subscription service.Sawyer wrote computer games which Atari developed and distributed. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 5:25 am
Another little IP gem from online subscription service LexisNexis Butterworths is the Chancery Division for England and Wales decision on Monday of Mr Justice Patten in Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd, so far unreported on BAILII.This was an application by Boehringer for ex parte interim injunctive relief to stop Vetplus publishing an advertisement and a press release in various journals relating to one of its products. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:46 pm
Judge keeps a straight face as Botox patent wrinkles and diesLexisNexis Butterworths' subscription service was first off the mark with Merz Pharma GmbH and Co KGaA v Allergan Inc, a Patents Court decision of Mr Justice Kitchin on Monday.Merz and Allergan both developed, made and sold pharma products. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Here's a little curio, courtesy of the LexisNexis Butterworths Update service: it's Pocket Kings Ltd v Safenames Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2529 (Ch), a 16 October 2009 decision of Michael Furness QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 7:41 am
TML Financial Solutions Ltd v More Business Ltd and others is a decision of Mr Justice Rimer in the Chancery Division (High Court, England and Wales) yesterday. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Another decision that slipped by last week was the ruling of Mr Justice Mann (Patents Court, England and Wales) in Matshusita Electric Industrial Company Ltd and others v UK Intellectual Property Office, a decision that has so far only made the columns of the subscription-only LexisNexis Butterworths service.Matsushita owned four patents for which no renewal fees were paid on the due date (9 December 2005). [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 5:42 am
The IPKat's twitchy whiskers - aided by the LexisNexis Butterworth service - have detected Luxim Corporation v Ceravision Ltd [2007] EWHC 1624 (Ch) (available here from BAILII), decided yesterday in the Patents Court by Mr Justice Warren - another of those small but important rulings on the mechanism that helps to determine which of two or more disputing parties is entitled to the rights in a patent.Luxim asserted that it was the successor in title to various rights, including… [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:50 am
The IPKat's eagle eye spotted Lunan Group Ltd v Edwin Co Ltd, which was lurking on LexisNexis Butterworth's subscription service. [read post]
