Search for: "Butterworth v. Butterworth"
Results 41 - 60
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2007, 11:59 am
More on Armenian design here and hereQuietly awaiting IPKat bloggie Jeremy on his return from the INTA Meeting in Chicago was his copy of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property and Technology Cases for April 2007. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:14 pm
Butterworth v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 3:12 pm
No need to repeat yourself, says Merpel.Right: without wanting to stick his neck out, the IPKat ventures to predict that interest in news and comment concerning IP continues to grow.What's in the March 2007 issue of LexisNexis Butterworths' Intellectual Property & Technology Cases, the IPKat hears you ask. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
” Butterworth concurred. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:46 am
(See also McLachlin and Taylor, in British Columbia Practice, 2d ed. looseleaf (Butterworths, 1991) pages 24-1 to 24-2-10, and the decision of this Court in Chavez v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 5:57 am
And well done, ZADNA (says Merpel), in coming up with such a bright, cheerful and seriously effective logo.The May 2007 issue of the IPKat's black and shiny Intellectual Property and Technology Cases, published by LexisNexis Butterworths as a paper-based handmaiden to its electronic service, has now reached his rain-saturated letterbox. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:50 pm
If you want to help Duncan in this exciting adventure, email him here with news of the litigation in your jurisdiction.Right: chocks away, as Duncan "Biggles" Bucknell" flies off around the world to service his clientele's international interestsOther scorecards on Duncan's website list the current state of play in the US v Czech Budweiser dispute (here), Ranbaxy's battle with Pfizer over Lipitor (here) and the Eli Lilly/Teva/Dr Reddy's fight over Zyprexa… [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 2:45 am
This case is not yet on BAILII but was picked up by LexisNexis Butterworths' subscription sevice.Above right: infringing, or merely asleep? [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:14 am
It stressed the reliability of the Canadian Encyclopedic Digest and touched briefly on Butterworths Ontario Digest and the Canadian Abridgement. [read post]
22 May 2016, 7:02 pm
Butterworth v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 11:29 am
In Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd and another [2008] EWHC 2078 (Pat), not yet available on BAILII but noted with extreme brevity by LexisNexis Butterworth's subscription service, Mr Justice Floyd has returned to an issue that is mentioned in his earlier decision in June -- the necessity (or otherwise) of Markem being given injunctive relief in respect of an undertaking which, Zipher had argued, was not really an undertaking not to amend one of its patents but a mere… [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
The Butterworths Intellectual Property Law Handbook (11th edition) has just been published by LexisNexis. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 7:24 am
Fysh slips through net of design right claimsBailey and Bailey v Haynes and Haynes, a Patents County Court decision of Judge Michael Fysh QC from 2 October, has been summarised on the Sweet & Maxwell Lawtel subscription service. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:35 pm
Everything you ever need to know about the IJLIT here.In stark contrast to IJLIT's blinding white is the gleaming black of Butterworths' Intellectual Property & Technology Cases law reports. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:15 pm
Merpel agrees, but adds that sometimes it is quite possible to work out the identity of the concealed celebrity - as happened to the unfortunate footballer in one of the cases cited in this judgment, A v B.Right Mann for the jobHesco Bastion Ltd v TFL Defence Ltd and others, decided yesterday in the Chancery Division, is a ruling of Judge Martin Mann QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, the IPKat found a note on it on LexisNexis Butterworths. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am
At 9.30am, in the case of The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis & anr v Times Newspapers and at 10.00am in the case of Aspion v Daniel. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:58 am
Wallace v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
G v E & Ors [2010] EWHC 3385 (Fam) (21 December 2010) – Read judgment Manchester City Council has been ordered to pay the full legal costs of a 20-year-old man with severe learning disabilities who was unlawfully removed from his long-term foster carer. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
The well-known and much used defence arises from the 1999 case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers in which the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) extended the defence of qualified privilege to cover the media. [read post]
