Search for: "Butts v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am
On December 11, 2019, the California Supreme Court by a 7-0 vote granted the petition for review of Butte and Plumas Counties and the Plumas County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in County of Butte v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:13 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit held in California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm
At 4, he immigrated to the United States as a U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
The time-bar will not apply where there exists a fraud claim that is in essence “sufficiently distinct” from a claim of legal malpractice (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 70 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:45 am
See, County of Butte v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:16 pm
I’m delighted to report that the Utah Supreme Court has just handed down an opinion in Butt v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 2:44 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
In its 2011 decision in Harrington v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 7:33 am
Brown, (4th Cir, Dec. 5, 2017), the 4th Circuit, reversing the district court in large part, held that an inmate had adequately stated a free exercise claim for denial of Rastafarian group religious services.In Butts v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Turner v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:51 am
Instead, they unequivocally state that Greenshield and Leevers found that the critical pressure at 10% air volume was 1.6 bar. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 1:16 pm
My last post pointed to a Columbus Bar Association press release about Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Butts v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
Another recitation on the high bar for finding inequitable conduct. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
The protection given to public officials by Sullivan in US law has been extended to embrace public figures in general (Curtis Publishing Co v Butts, Associated Press v Walker 388 US 130 [1967]) Nor is a complete bar necessary to ensure freedom of speech. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Butts (1967)…. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Superior Court of Butte County, Case No. [read post]
