Search for: "Butts v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
Crawford, he did not try his scheme in the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Butts, Jr., Fotios Geivelis, Jr., also known as Frank Anastasio, Worldwide Funding III Limited LLC, Douglas J. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:23 am by jonathanturley
CNN, No. 0:22-cv-61842, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
United States, a case that could have major Fourth Amendment implications. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
The “argument grounded in jurisprudence” concerns developments in the United States and the Commonwealth (at [66] et seq.). [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am by SHG
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Internet Cases Blog has published there articles covering significant recent cases in the United States: A summary judgment was recently awarded in favour of Chanel following the luxury brands challenge to the registrant of the domain name <chanelgraffitti.com>. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:06 am
She stated the defendant touched her more than once on her butt, crotch, and thighs. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia notes, ineffective assistance is a claim raised by a convicted criminal defendant that their attorney’s performance was so ineffective that it deprived them of the constitutional right guaranteed by the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]