Search for: "Buxton, Inc., Appeal of"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
TDCJ-CID (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)Buxton v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:37 am
Availability of absolute or qualified privilege in judicial and quasi-judicial actionsRosenberg v Metlife, Inc, 8 NY3d 359The Rosenberg decision provides an opportunity to explore the issue of the “qualified immunity” and the “absolute immunity” of individuals in the public service sued for alleged libel or slander flowing from their performance of an official duty.The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit asked the New York State Court of… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian Trade… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Speaker: William F Patry (Chief Copyright Counsel, Google Inc.) [read post]
